Vijay Kumar Shunglu responds

<i>DEBATE @ THE HINDU</i>

February 26, 2013 01:40 am | Updated December 04, 2021 11:40 pm IST

Foreign players were permitted to enter the insurance sector quite a few years ago, and they have done so. The current debate is not about their continuance or restoration of public sector monopoly in the insurance business. It is about their enhanced participation and its potential for creating substantial economic benefit.

It is true that the industry needs significant capital in the future. Whereas the LIC has existed for more than 55 years, the private life insurance industry (23 companies) has generally developed in three waves over the past decade. While a few in the first wave may not require significant capital, half of the companies remain in the early development stages and continue to require significant capital.

Unlike other businesses, life insurance companies need to build up huge reserves to pay future claims of their policyholders and to pay for significant upfront costs prior to profits emerging from long-term sales. Unfortunately, it is also true that some domestic promoters would like to sell all or a part of their shares and/or stop funding new capital given their shorter-term investment time horizon.

It is also not the case that all foreign companies are good. Nor are the foreign promoters of Indian life insurance companies speculators on the verge of bankruptcy. They are large, multi-national life insurance companies who have been in the business for decades.

Economic and industry experts have all lined up in support of the Insurance Bill and the increase in foreign investment to 49 per cent, including India’s own independent insurance regulatory body, IRDA.

The amended Insurance Bill, due to be tabled before Parliament in the Budget Session, is not something to be feared. As I stated in my article, I continue to recommend that the amended Insurance Bill should keep matters simple by lifting the total foreign investment limit to 49 per cent and ensure its passage. Shareholders should be left to determine the best way to address a company’s needs — whether through FDI or FII.

(Vijay Kumar Shunglu is former Comptroller and Auditor General of India and has headed several key government committees on various issues.)

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.