Internecine hill battle

To maintain the peace in Darjeeling, the Gorkha Janmukti Morcha needs to sort out the leadership tangle

December 11, 2017 12:15 am | Updated 12:15 am IST

Bimal Gurung, head of the Gorkha Janmukti Morcha (GJM) party that seeks the creation of a separate state of Gorkhaland, takes part in a news conference in Darjeeling on June 14, 2017.
Thousands of tourists fled the Indian hill resort of Darjeeling on June 12 after local activists demanding the creation of a new Indian state warned that a general strike could degenerate into violence. Hundreds of troops and riot police patrolled the streets of the famed tea-producing resort in eastern India as panicked tourists packed their bags. / AFP PHOTO / DIPTENDU DUTTA

Bimal Gurung, head of the Gorkha Janmukti Morcha (GJM) party that seeks the creation of a separate state of Gorkhaland, takes part in a news conference in Darjeeling on June 14, 2017. Thousands of tourists fled the Indian hill resort of Darjeeling on June 12 after local activists demanding the creation of a new Indian state warned that a general strike could degenerate into violence. Hundreds of troops and riot police patrolled the streets of the famed tea-producing resort in eastern India as panicked tourists packed their bags. / AFP PHOTO / DIPTENDU DUTTA

As winter arrives in Darjeeling, the two pillars of the region’s economy, tea and tourism, are picking up the pieces after a 104-day shutdown from June to September led by the key hill party, the Gorkha Janmukti Morcha (GJM), for a separate state for Gorkhas. But politically, there are several loose ends which need to be tied up before peace can finally return to the hills, particularly the leadership issue of the GJM that is proving to be more than the proverbial storm in a teacup.

Tug of war

The GJM was founded by Bimal Gurung in 2007, soon after he and his trusted aide Binay Tamang helped a Kolkata Police constable Prashant Tamang win Indian Idol 3 by organising mass votes for the singer. The GJM was replacing the Gorkha National Liberation Front, whose leader Subhas Ghising found himself isolated in the hills, as the primary hill party. When Mamata Banerjee became Chief Minister in 2011, the GJM agreed to the formation of the Gorkha Territorial Administration (GTA). Mr. Gurung became its chief executive. Cut to 2017. When the GJM called the blockade renewing the demand for Gorkhaland, it was led by Mr. Gurung. The announcement of ending the bandh also came from him, but by then, he was on the run from the West Bengal police, implicated in several cases from triggering violence to misappropriation of funds. Mr. Gurung is now fighting for his cause in the Supreme Court, with his lawyers arguing that the West Bengal government had “broken” the GJM.

But if the GJM is “broken”, it happened because a section of the party, led by Mr. Gurung’s aide-turned-adversary Mr. Tamang, showed an inclination to negotiate with the State government when the blockade showed no signs of ending. Ms. Banerjee moved in swiftly, naming Mr. Tamang as chairperson of a new board of administrators to head the GTA whose five-year tenure expired in July. After the vertical split in the party, Mr. Tamang, now GJM chief, has been consolidating the cadre, trying to fill the leadership void as Mr. Gurung, suspended from the party, finds himself in the same position as Ghising — in a corner and kept out of the hills.

Meanwhile, Ms. Banerjee has made inroads into the hills, clipping the GJM’s wings and making it apparent in no uncertain terms that she is against a division of the State. In such a scenario, can Mr. Tamang hold the GJM, whose raison d’etre is a separate State, together? Party cadre is divided. Mr. Tamang’s elevation was met with violence initially, but with Mr. Gurung in hiding, many supporters have veered towards the leader visible on the ground.

With the Chief Minister announcing that she will head to Darjeeling on December 27 for a tourism festival, she is sending a signal that the Bengal government has regained control over Darjeeling. But till the GJM can sort out the leadership tangle and redress the grievances of the people, no one leader can claim control over the hills.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.