Restricting Twitter

January 31, 2012 12:03 am | Updated October 18, 2016 12:37 pm IST

Rulers in many countries are indeed “uncomfortable that Twitter is now a household name, and its reach, at a billion tweets put out every four days, nightmarish” (editorial “The revolution will not be tweeted,” Jan. 30). Twitter, Facebook and other social networking sites have made freedom of speech and expression real. The political class seems to be worried because of the direct criticism it draws for its acts. Any attempt to invade the privacy of individuals in the name of regulation is against democracy.

Gururajan Ramachandran,

Chennai

The most striking aspect of the jasmine revolution was the unique role Facebook and Twitter played in organising and spreading the protest, and making the revolution visible to the rest of the world. They played a decisive role in reaching out. The attempt to censor them just because they have posts criticising governments is truly repressive and cannot be tolerated. Self- regulation can be demanded from them, but censorship is a strict ‘no-no.'

Thasneem Azeez,

Ernakulam

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.