Dissent is not sedition

September 18, 2012 01:09 am | Updated 01:09 am IST

This refers to the news analysis “ >Dissent, thy name is sedition? ” (Sept. 17). The absence of specific laws governing the limits to the responses by the police, the state as well as agitators during a popular protest is the primary issue. It has given rise to vandalism and violence by agitators; ad hoc and impulsive police action that is heavy-handed and the use of open-ended charges like ‘sedition’ by the state to stifle popular dissent.

Dissent is common in a democracy. Therefore, it is important to enact specific laws to moderate and rein in the state’s response while instituting guidelines for protesters to conduct themselves peacefully.

Varigonda Kesava Chandra,

Singapore

The Centre and the Tamil Nadu government are responsible for the unrest in Kudankulam. They have not won people’s confidence. The villagers are not against the nuclear power plant; they are only concerned about the aftermath of a nuclear accident. In view of the Fukushima disaster and the fact that the victims of the Bhopal gas tragedy are yet to get justice, it is only natural for people in and around Kudankulam to be concerned.

T. Anand Raj,

Chennai

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.