Disorder in the House

December 22, 2017 11:46 pm | Updated 11:46 pm IST

There have been grievances that public personalities who become Rajya Sabha MPs have poor attendance in the House and rarely speak on issues (“Sachin out for duck in House”, December 22). But when they do speak, no one listens. Sachin Tendulkar’s maiden speech should have been welcomed in the House. Disrupting proceedings in Parliament has become a regular feature. When people are advised to increase their productivity, shouldn’t the same rule apply to our parliamentarians?

R. Krishnamachary,

Chennai

The disruption exposes the kind of respect that our parliamentarians have for sports and sportspersons. Partypersons can disapprove of the government and its leaders and policies, but Tendulkar should have been allowed to complete what he had to say as he seldom attends Parliament and it is even rarer for him to be given time to make a speech. Adjournments are a drain on the national exchequer. It’s time to enact a law to penalise members for disrupting proceedings.

R. Prabhu Raj,

Bengaluru

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.