Death penalty

December 11, 2012 12:52 am | Updated December 04, 2021 11:13 pm IST

With its eye-for-an-eye approach, the death penalty hardly deserves a place in a civilised society. Several countries have abolished it, considering its poor deterrent effect. While the Supreme Court has enunciated principles on the basis of which the death sentence should be awarded, concerns over the manner in which they are applied are legitimate and need to be addressed (“For a moratorium on death sentence,” Dec. 10).

M. Jeyaram,

Sholavandan

By assuming that the sole reason for imposition of the death penalty is to prevent the criminal from repeating the offence, abolitionists assume that retribution and satisfaction for the victims’ families are of no consequence. As for deterrence, the effect would be felt only if the execution is carried out swiftly.

Ravi Shankar,

Hyderabad

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.