Politicians should be cut some slack for making exaggerated claims and launching strong and satirical attacks on their rivals in the heat of electioneering. But Gujarat’s Chief Minister Narendra Modi has displayed shockingly bad taste in making an issue about the money allegedly spent on Congress president Sonia Gandhi’s foreign travels in recent years, often for medical treatment. First, he repeated, on the basis of an unsourced newspaper report, that the Centre had spent a wildly improbable Rs. 1,880 crore on her overseas trips. When he came under fire for this unsubstantiated attack, Mr. Modi simply changed tack. All right, he argued, if it was not Rs. 1,880 crore tell us how much? And then, in a hugely unconvincing attempt to retrieve a hopeless situation, he demanded the United Progressive Alliance government disclose how much public money was spent on her foreign trips from 2004, or well before she took ill. With the Central Information Commission clarifying that Ms Gandhi had not sought any reimbursement from the Centre for her medical expenditure, Mr. Modi’s attack seems even more malicious and insulting. That he chose to score points off a political rival’s illness shows the moral depths he is prepared to plumb in his pursuit of power.
It is possible that Mr. Modi simply put his foot in his mouth in levelling this wild allegation. But his recent election speeches suggest that targeting the Gandhi family is part of a larger political strategy. First he attacked Rahul Gandhi for having a mother who was born outside India, saying that he could win an election in Italy if he liked. And now this. Mr. Modi may well believe that identifying the Gandhis as his principal rival is a clever way of signalling his ambition to climb the national political stage before the 2014 general election. While he must be unreservedly condemned for saying what he did, the likelihood of such a controversy erupting would be far less had there not been such an impenetrable veil of secrecy drawn over Ms Gandhi’s medical condition and treatment. An individual’s medical treatment is private information and, as the CIC has correctly pointed out, any personal expenditure on it cannot be the subject matter of an RTI application. But Ms Gandhi, as Chairperson of the UPA and the National Advisory Council, is a public figure and the degree of secrecy surrounding her medical condition is unusual for a democracy. While her privacy, like the privacy of all citizens, is paramount, the Congress high command should realise it is precisely the absence of any authoritative information that provides fertile ground for rumours and canards to spread.
Keywords: Narendra Modi, Sonia medical expenses, 2014 general election, Gandhi family, national politics



Looks like all forces are being used especially media to influence the opinion of a common man. Such articles should be condemned. I appeal Hindu to preserve what it is known for.
After reading this articles, which seems more like a half-blinded
ramble, I am disappointed in your newspaper...please preserve your
quality and identity in this God-forsaken world where everything seems
to have a price....I have no respect for Modi, but I do for the
Hindu...please beware, you seem to be slipping
I think that We all must recognize our limits. The press must stick
to impartiality, objectivity and justness. The newspapers should
neither work like mouthpieces of political parties nor indulge in
character assassination of any person or leader. Mr Modi must give
evidence to substantiate his claims. Mrs Gandhi must take initiative
to come out clean by giving correct information by herself. so far as
the privacy of matter is concerned, if this is a private matter of Mrs
Sonia gandhi, why all congress leaders so desperately jump into arena
of mudslinging. let Mrs Gandhi herself answer it......
Excellent article. The opposition parties are ready to stoop to any level for their vote bank. I hope to see UPA III in 2014.
In an instance of government footing the medical expenses on late Union Minister Murasoli Maran who was ailing for long furore was raised in political circles over it whereupon,if I remember correct, his family came forward to bear his medical expenses though perhaps he would have as public servant been entitled to it.There was no RTI then!
Modi bashing is the favourite occupation of the pseudo-intellectuals
of the leftists kind. Nothing better can be expected of left leaning
arm chair critics since they rightfully fear that the Left will soon
turn from being redundant to a fosillized entity.
Unfortunately for them they cannot even pray as their cult does not
allow them to! But the fact is, thanks to them, he is our next PM and
under him their worst fears will bear fruit- India will become a super
power and once again become the beacon of this world after a millennium of alien rule!
Mr.S.Srinivasan has queried above how much money the govt. has spent on Mrs.Gandhi's travel abroad.His query up to this is OK.He has further queried what are the places she visited and who accompanied her during such travels.He has averred that the people are entitled to know the facts.These latter queries are,to say the least, are irrelevant as far as public interest is concerned.It is not in anybody's domain to seek to know the places she visited abroad etc.unless one is sure that the trips were with malafide intentions to the detriment of India's interests.When no such a thing is even suspected,the queries only betray the writer transgressing the lakshman rekha of non interference in a fellow citizen's personal affairs.I am no Sonia admirer but rather one who would like to see the back of the Congress for obvious reasons.But I would also like to call a spade a spade without being influenced by any extraneous considerations.
Your editorial is a mature exercise in maintaining political decency. In Mahatma's words Modi is habituating to " view everything through a sewage tunnel"
I had always felt that The Hindu was blatantly anti Hindu and pro congress and immigrants. Your paper never reported on the secular gangs of Ghaziabad and their protest.
Any way seeing the response of your readers taking you to task for your 'uneditorlike' and biased language against the Gujarat CM has made my day. Not that I like him. But we all have to choose sides. Anyday, Modi over Rahul and the likes of Muyalam.
So far none of my letter has been published in the The Hindu and I don't have any hope that this mail will be published. Anyway this is for you. And I will continue to buy The Hindu; you have interesting readers.
It would be quite an extraordinary claim if it is said that Sonia
Gandhi's medical expenses were in no way reimbursed or supported by
tax payers money. If unless proved otherwise, chances of which I
consider quite bleak as explained below, the onus is on the party and
its leaders to explain the expenditure in any convincing way to the
common man, by the time all credibility of clean image of Gandhi
family as above corruption would be gone for long. 1) Sonia Gandhi's
source of income from RTI filing show some paltry sum which would not
even take care of a weeks medical expenditure at Sloan Kettering. In
short the documented income and even liquidation of assets wont be
sufficient to cover the medical expense in any case 2)Who has footed
this short fall, or continuing to foot the bill? This could either be
funded by party or by her misusing her position as real power center
to channel tax money to her travel. IF it is former, then why arent
paid bills as proofs, been forthcoming?
This is an example of what happens when politician drowned in arrogance
of power, authority and money doesn't find it worth to practice
maturity, patience and accommodation of rival-the essence of multiparty
democracy.
I think several commenters here have it wrong. Mr.Modi or any other citizen of India does not
deserve to have their views and opinions to be taken seriously by default. If Mr.Modi wants to
make a charge, the onus is on him to establish prima facie evidence, and not on Sonia
Gandhi to prove that she is innocent. Mr.Modi might have a right to raise questions for sure,
but he does cannot demand that his views be taken seriously, not unless he substantiates
his argument with evidence, which, embarassingly for him, he seems to not have done in this
case. That's how our justice system works too; the prosecution must prove guilt, the accused
shouldnt have to prove innocence. If Sonia Gandhi were to respond to every allegation ever
made against her on poor evidence then there is no end to it.
We, the common people, do not want the politicians to rule us. We do not
want nepotism of any kind. We want more transparency and honesty in
dealing with public. We wish to have a governing body of scientists,
doctors, engineers, professors, and other sincere persons to rule us. We
are unhappy to see wasting of editorial space on irrelevant issues.
I would appreciate it, if you would write an editorial on mis-treating the 2 poor women in karnataka at 15 rs and at no pay over the last decade - we need your voice for them not for sonia.
Please do the needful !
The Hindu has this tradition of ridiculing anything that comes up against the so called secular Congress government. Therefore it did not take much time to post its views on Mr.Modi's revelations . A responsible newspaper is not supposed to portray its opinion about something. Its sole duty is to report the incident. But as always when it comes to politics , The Hindu acts like a prostitute at the hands of Congress leadership. It does whatever keeps the congress satisfied. Denying/ignoring the prominent faults .
I have never seen this kind of biased journalistic attitude from the
Hindu before. Especially editorials used to be neutral. It is a shame.
so what is wrong if someone questions if the govt has paid for Mrs. Sonia Gandhi's treatments or for her foreign travels? The question is in the first place is if that is the case then why didn't the govt do so and how much money has been spent? I now read how Robert Vadara (son-in-law of Mrs. Gandhi) benefited from DLF sweetheart deals, I wonder what prompted DLF to be so generous with Mr. Vadara... what did DLF get in return?
Digvijay Singh does this all the time and media conveniently ignores even some of the nasty claims as it is directed against BJP. Now, the pay back is hurting big they are whining. What hypocrisy!
This editorial is quite below the belt, as it seems to fawn on Sonia Gandhi as much as it goes all out to denigrate Modi. Is Modi wrong in asking the hard-hitting questions? We have seen over the years a token Union Minister or State CM always accompanying select members of the Gandhi family so that the official machinery, including aircraft always at the disposal of the Gandhi family. And when such aircraft is used, the feeble Government has to defend that it spent no money on the Gandhi family while in reality crores are indeed being spent!
The comments on (1)Mrs.Gandhi's medical expenses and (2) the strident tone of Mody's averments thereon have been guided more by one's disposition towards the two personalities rather than the merits of the two issues. In the process more than the real issues being highlighted, only bare emotions had taken the centre stage.
Not exactly an article worthy of The Hindu. I hope the writer gets pulled up for such a biased article. Essentially , what the writer is conveying is that MS Gandhi is right and Mr Modi wrong. Have you pondered over the fact that Mr Modi was questioning the cost of the trip , and not the health issue itself?
May be CAG need to start reviewing scams less that few lakh croses. One or two thousand crore is also significant amount in India where if you make Rs 30/- working for full day qualifies you to be resourceful and not poor.
The issue of Mrs.Sonia Gandhi's medical expenses would need to be given a quietus it deserves once the public authority concerned has said that she had not sought for reimbursement of money from the State exchequer. When the government has not borne any part of her medical expenses, it is immaterial for people as to how much she had spent on her ailment as it is purely a personal matter.As regards her health condition, howsoever big a public figure she be, the people have no right to demand to know it simply because ours is a democratic polity.It is up to her to share it or not with others.The public concern should stop with the CIC clarifying that she has not claimed reimbursement of money from the government.
I approve the editorial.....A spade must be called a spade.Let modi dream for thousand nights of becoming a PM.It will remain a dream.The people of India will not be carried away by such cheap talk.
This article has devoted more reportage for Modi-bashing than the
reasons for its necessisity that too as editorial.An a regular follower
of your esteemed newspaper it is painful to note the tilt in the
arguments.Such articles in the same newspaper which recently published a
unique political analysis by Shri.Siddarth Varadarajan make us feel
uneasy to say the least.
The more I read "The Hindu", the more I am convinced that it is becoming a political mouthpiece of the Congress. Once again, with this anti-Modi article, the Hindu is hell-bent on proving its political inclination. Way to go!
The Hindu has stooped yet again owing to its editorial failures. This article could have been just titled "Modi's mistreatment of Ms. Gandhi".
Plainly biased article that probably didn't go through any editorial review. It is sad to let this come through in the Opinion Pages.
Yes, Modi let his imagination loose. He must be condemned for any losing sense quoting wild figures. at the same time, I don't see a problem in his demand for clarification. If indeed exchequers funds are being misused, any citizen deserves to know. And the citizen could ask about it however he chooses to - with satire, with gravity or with cries, that shouldn't make it any less serious.
I am all for privacy of personal issues, but if character is being questioned, then attempt to come out clear. Coming under the 'Gandhi' family & under Nehruvian legacy, it is not understandable why Sonia Gandhi is unable to come out clean openly about this issue!
The Hindu will do good to apply some sense on its Opinion Pages.
If Sonia has not spent a paisa from the exchequer let it be said so, if Modi or for that matter any Indian citizen wants to know what was spent from the exchequer what is wrong? why congress is deflecting the question and make it look personal , even if someone asks what President spent on the foreign tour or for that Modi spent on his foreign tour they are legitimate question if spent from the public exchequer.
I am surprised to see a article in The Hindu, which is full of individual criticism. I am not a big fan of Mr. Modi, but please stay neutral and keep the journalistic standards that you have done for several decades........
How would it damage Ms Gandhi's reputation and personal image if goverment releases the information regarding the money that government has spent on her foreign trips? It would have been helpful if The Hindu answered this too on behalf of Ms Gandhi if it is trying to back her up in using public money.
The Hindu's well earned reputation as an independent newspaper will come to naught if it
too joins the media circus and buries all information on the Gandhi family. There can be no
two standards- the Gandhi's and the rest. If you wish to engage with the public on this
matter, why don't we see any investigative reports on the travels of the countries most
powerful politician in this paper? With power comes accountability or at least that's what we
believe the Press is there to enforce. Mr. Modi's intervention need not be finessed enough
for the back slapping New Delhi media elite, for it to be brutally effective in communicating
what many folks are wondering. For example- just how much does it cost to support the
existence of our 'first family'? When the Queen of England must submit accounts to the UK
Parliament- how can we be denied knowledge of the travel & security costs of Sonia
Gandhi? Frankly, why must the readers remind it's Press to pursue the truth regardless of
the politician.
Our Politicians should learn dignity and decorum from Obama-Romney debates!
Strongly echo the sentiments of some of our friend's comments here. Politics today is all about one's personality, credibility & integrity. Mr Modi has become the all-mightier chief minister just because of his relentless fight against the biased media and untiring work that he has done. Despite his strong performance and proven track record, whenever an opportunity is presented to the media to bash Mr Modi, it takes it to the fullest, whereas the same yardstick is not applied to Ms Gandhi. For instance, when Ms Gandhi was pronounced as one among the richest politicians in the world with billions of dollars, most of the media kept quiet. Why did it not go to the next level of details? Can we expect that restraint when it comes to others?
The article is heavily biased against Mr. Modi.
What is the harm if he demands an explaination over Mrs. Gandhi's expenditure over foreign trips?
Also, if the author finds its inappropriate for Mr.Modi to ask about the expenditure, then he should also take into regards the various inappropriate comments made by Mrs.Gandhi on him and the work he has done in Gujarat.
As long as the print and electronic media is on her side no Modi can
mistreat her.May your pro-congress tradition live long.
My opinion on this article:
After having read the article and then the replies from the people, one thing is very clear that people of India cannot be befooled by such articles.
The objective of this article is quite clear. This is an attempt to defame a great politician like Mr.Modi. Well said Gowri Shankar Ji. I am from Uttar Pradesh and I want someone like Mr.Modi to rule over UP so that the pathetic condition of the state, because of both BSP and SP, could change and UP can progress. The development in Gujarat under Mr.Modi and the reality about Soniaji and Rahul Gandhi doesn't need to be told. All Indians by now, are well aware of both Mr.Modi and Soniaji.
This refers to your editorial, is aptly said that the absence of any authoritative information that provides fertile ground for rumours and canards to spread, where the controversy is over the figure of amount spent on the Congress president.
The Congress party, established by Mahatma Gandhi is known as ardent follower of principle, "SATYAMEVA JAYATE", should not hesitate to reveal the ACTUAL FIGURE of amount spent on her treatment of illness instead of issuing a series of denials and making counter allegations as well expression of anger over T.V. Channels. The whole nation is interested to know the real amount though the ruling party is licenced to squander tax-payers' money. By doing so, they can easily clear off the imaginations in public mind on the figure. The more they conceal the fact the more grave the assumptions in the public.
We are living in a democratic society and the every citizen has the right to information on the tax-payers' money with limitations.
It has significance to protect the whistleblowers/RTI Activist from the threat of powerful politicians.
Narendra Modi is not someone I see as my nation's prime-minister. Mulayam Singh Yadav, SP supremo, said he won't be a 'saint' to turn down the seat of prime-minister should he get a chance. Well, it is about what the nation requires and you can give. We are a drowning boat... someone has to take lead. Often I see people yelping 'corruption' when they have something to get cleared by Govt. I don't understand that Govt servent never changes, only ruling parties do. I mean could icing ever change the flavour of cake? I don't know much. But, I just want this nation to survive. I am an engineer and I will always do my bit, by the best of my wits.
WHY Secular Congress President Sonia Gandhi refused to disclose information regarding her Income Tax (IT) returns. She claimed that her privacy would be at stake if she discloses the details of her IT returns. If they can’t, there’s something to hide or there’s too much wealth that they’re embarrassed to declare.
The unfortunate thing is that most of the readers of the Hindu may not understand the language Hindi so they did not hear the words coming out of Modi's Mouth(the only exposure being the English media), he Never said that how much has been spend on "Sonia's Health" he asked "how much has been spent on her foreign trips since 2004" and its a legitimate question, the detailed breakup of such expenditure coming from tax payers money is Every Indians right, some choose to exercise it and some cut the unwarranted slack, but if someone asks the question , the only way to respond is the make public the information asked,why make it a big deal unless they have something to hide.
The Hindu, true to its tradition has used the opportunity to taunt Mr. Modi. In the process, it carefully ignores the issue at stake.
What Mr. Modi has asked is "How much of public money is spent on Sonia's health bills". Do not understand how CIC (which was sleeping for 2 years with the RTI suddenly sprung into action) claims it be a private affair and personal expenditure.
If she pays out of her pocket, then nobody is quesitoning her. But if taxpayers money is involved, people have every right to know about it and it cannot be private/personal affair.
The Hindu in its rush to deride modi has failed to see reason and has got its foot in its mouth.
My inferences upon reading this article -
1. It is totally biased against Modi
2. [and more than that what worries me is that] the author of the article appears to be heavily biased in favour of Ms. Gandhi.
I'm not against Sonia per se.. but an independent editor of an esteemed Newspaper is expected to be neutral - and I guess my expectations are reasonable.
The author conveniently chose to be silent on Modi's question about the constituitional status of Ms. Gandhi.. Modi had pointed out that only the PM and President are eligible for special airplanes. So, he asked to spell out the reason for extending that rarest of the rare privilege to ordinary MPs such as the mother-son duo of Sonia and Rahul.. Everyone in India knows that Ms.Gandhi has more political power than our PM.. But at the end of the day, aren't they just MPs?
We should look where we are going.
Mr Modi has amply clarified that Ms Gandhi is entitled to best medical
treatment and the govt should meet such genuine expenditure.Her
medical expenses is NOT the matter of discussion.This being
clear,congress spokespersons and ministers twist the issue, as they do
often.
The issue is why the UPA govt has not so far replied to the query as
to how much money the govt has spent on her travel abroad.What is the
difficulty in furnishing the information? what are the places she
visited and who accompanied her during such travels? People are
entitled to know the facts.
As a reader of the Hindu for the last 5 decades,I request the Hindu to
keep its readers informed well on the matter.
CM Modi might or might not have a valid point to make. However the way he has made that point clearly shown himself unfit to lead public office even at CM level let alone national level.
Gujarat tactics don't work at the national level, Mr. Modi.
An editorial with very bad taste! 'The Hindu' should practice what it preaches. It is nothing but Modi Bashing which is a favourite passtime for media. Why should there be so much secrecy around the travel?. Ms Sonia is travelling by private charted flights. Naturally as a responsible newspaper 'The Hindu' and the rest of media should have investigated the source of expenses. Even if the Govt. is not spending which is hardly convincing, who is spending? Even today the Govt. has not come out with any clear cut reply. If its own spending, what is the source of her earnings? These are legitimate questions the editorial team should have asked. Remember Ms Sonia is not an ordinary citizen and infact she is the real ruler of our country.
As for Mr Modi's comment on Mr Rahul, its again a legitimate comment when the sycopants tried to belittle Mr Modi. 'The Hindu' should ponder about the intentions with which its founders started this newspaper during the British period!
Mud-slinging is part and parcel of political life and I assume that the entire Gandhi
family are intimately aware of this.
God knows Modi has many faults and hopefully the courts in this world and in the
next will seriously look at those but one cannot blame him for what is routine in
politics.
What is much more serious is the large amount of money spent by the government
on foreign travels of persons who are not ministers or holding any designated
posts. The name of Montek Singh Ahluwalia comes foremost to mind. PM Singh
really needs to get rid of these albatrosses around his neck.
Unfortunately, in our country, political leaders behave like street fighters. With CIC clarification that Government has not paid any medical bill of Ms Gandhi, the best Mr. Modi could do is to apologize for the wild allegation he made.
I am surprised to see this article in The Hindu.
Modi asked the government of India to furnish details about public
money spent on Mrs. Gandhi's foreign tours and I think he is doing this
in the capacity of being a citizen of this country. There is nothing
wrong in it. Instead of focusing on the reasons why central government
is running away from furnishing the details this article is attacking
Mr. Modi for his very rightful demand.
Some people are comparing this with Modi's own trip to China and Japan,
this is like comparing apple with oranges. He traveled in the capacity
of Chief Minister of Gujarat whereas Mrs. Gandhi can only avail
benefits that an ordinary MP can avail.
Since the government is running away from furnishing details I am bound
to believe that government has many skeletons to hide and so instead of
giving direct reply to Mr Modi's question there are attempts from
various quarters to diverse it by counter attack on Mr. Modi.
Narendra Modi who has been raising questions on the expenditure on foreign travels of Congress president Sonia Gandhi, an RTI activist, Trupti Shah, in Gujarat has accused the state government of not providing details on the travel bills of the chief minister and his ministers for the last five years. Instead of personal attacking, Modi should focus on local issues. Otherwise it creates a picture that Modi has failed in Gujarat in last 5 year and so he tries to divert the issues.
This editorial lacks any objectivity and appears to be a part of The
Hindu's tirade against Mr. Modi. This smacks of prejudice and trying to
portray Mr. Modi in poor taste. (This appear to be a pastime for Hindu
for a long time)
I did have the respect for the Editorial in The Hindu, so far , for it
was not biased against any. But this editorial, while condemning Modi's
speech, has gone to the lower level like our politicians. It is totally
biased and I agree with Gowri shankar and I condemn this article for the
language against Mr. Modi. We as the people of India has every right to
know who funded Ms. Gandhi's Travel, stay, Medical claims etc., as
definitely, full or atleast a part of it, is spend from my pocket.
Whatever Modi’s motives may have been, his claim can be easily
disproved – if the Congress and the UPA government wish to. All that
the government has to do is to have the answers to Verma’s questions
in his RTI application answered. The questions he raises pertain not
to any issue of Sonia Gandhi’s privacy – for instance, relating to her
income tax returns or her health status – but on public spending on
her foreign trips. Those are legitimate questions to raise.
But the runaround that Verma’s application has been subjected to for
two years now, and the Congress’ reflexive resort to secrecy in all
matters relating to Sonia Gandhi, effectively forces the Congress and
the UPA government on the defensive on this issue. Responding to
questions on a CNN-IBN show on Monday night, Manish Tewari sought to
deflect attention away from Sonia Gandhi by wondering if it was
legitimate to ask how much had been spent on Modi’s trips abroad, who
had funded his trips, and so on. The answer, of course, that it is
perfectly legitimate. What isn’t legitimate, however, is the
“conspiracy of silence” that the party would prefer to maintain on the
entire issue.
I do not want to encourage mud slinging. But mud slinging is already part of the politics of India, being a democracy. It is universal in all democracies, except that the degree varies from country to country. Whether the 'maut kaa saudaagar' comments started the mud slinging, and as to who will sling the last mudpie, etc are questions debatable. But the trend can't be reversed ! However, when it comes to the key question, that is the source of funds enjoyed by a public person, I think it can't be kept hidden as a matter of privacy. Public persons should certainly expect to have less privacy than private persons.
The Title mistreating Ms.Gandhi is totally wrong. Mr.Modi has never
questioned the amount spent on Treatment of Ms.Gandhi. What Mr.Modi and
people of India wanted to know is how much the Government has spend on
the Travel of Ms.Gandhi.Ms.Gandhi do not hold any cabinet post or any
important portfolio which requires her to travel abroad. We tax paying
people have the right to know how much the Government has spend from our
money.
Mr. Modi has always been known to use harsh tones and aggressive use of his voice box to prove himself better in front of is competitors.But this time he has himself fallen prey to the trap laid by his own words.With reports of his own government using state funds for their own foreign trips ,he himself has much to answer the people of Gujarat and India.To do this he might even use a shrill voice and a humble tone unlike his natural style but as long as the people get answers we don't mind!
This way Modi is fighting with himself and slowly he has shown that he is also most unable to fit for any post above his present position.Peaples of India be aware.
This is in response to your editorial titled (Mis)treating Ms. Gandhi. I strongly condemn this article which seeks to engage in character assasination of Mr. Modi. An editorial is expected to adhere to the norms of objectivity and must be professional and unbiased. However, the statement "That he chose to score points off a political rival’s illness shows the moral depths he is prepared to plumb in his pursuit of power " clearly shows that the editorial lacks objectivity and is indulging in character assasination. How can you prove the above mentioned statement. This is a personal attack and comments on morality lack objectivity. Further, the editorial conveniently ignores the fact that Mr. Modi's satirical statements on Mr. Rahul Gandhi were in fact reactions to the comments made by Mr.Digvijaya Singh and Mr. Alvi who tried to belittle Mr. Modi by saying he is a regional cheiftan when compared to Mr. Gandhi who is a national leader. Hope such derogatory editorials are not repeated.
It is unfortunate that the pursuit of political power in India has no
boundaries in the political discourse and can stoop so low as in the
case of attack on the expenditure on Mrs.Sonia's trips abroad.Modi
should follow at least minimum courtesy expected of ordinary being and
concentrate on issues which are plenty to seek people's mandate and not
waste his time and energy on frivolous issues which are of no
consequence to win elections.
G.Kulandaivelu
Mr Modi slipped and gave a chance for the media to have a field day - and you are having one. The Government should categorically state if it has funded the private foreign trips of Mrs Gandhi and if so what's the tab item-wise - air travel, accomodation, security, surface transport and the same goes for any person who accompanied her? Failing to do so means that the Government wants to hide something other than the health of Mrs.G.
Mud-slinging on the face of opponents has become a common thing for political parties. This habit invariably becomes most pronounced at the time of elections and there will be no exaggeration in it if anyone states that sky becomes the limit for accusations on such occasions. Umpteen examples can be cited but that will be futile,as people are not naive to the extent of not knowing things happening around them. Crowds gather at election meetings mostly to have fun and some diversion from their monotonous routines. In each and every constituency, a common venue should be given to the contesting candidates for making them speak about what they have already done and what further they intended to do on various issues of concern to the people.That should be the lone influencing factor for securing votes. There is always the talk about conducting free and fair elections but, in practice, not much has been done in that regard. This situation should change, the sooner the better.
Please Email the Editor