Silence is golden

Connect with friends and sharpen the grey cells.

September 22, 2012 04:45 pm | Updated July 12, 2016 07:12 am IST

An ill-advised penalty double enabled declarer to play the hand, from an eight deal Chicago, double-dummy, as it were.

Contract: 4 H by south. West leads the D J.

Analysis: The double suggests that east has all the five remaining trumps and so you have four losers; two in trumps, one in spade, and one in club.

How the play went: Declarer won with the ace, east following with the nine to show even number of diamonds. A spade was played from dummy. East went in with the ace and exited in C 2, an obvious singleton. West followed with the jack and declarer won with the ace. Declarer successfully finessed the H J next and west showed out, as expected. He cashed two diamonds now, pitching a club from hand. Declarer cashed two more spades, both defenders following suit. The last five-card position was:

Declarer played the S J from hand and discarded a club from dummy.

If east ruffs and plays the H 7, declarer can run it to the nine in dummy and finesse the H Q for his tenth trick. If he ruffs and plays the H T, declarer finesses the queen, and exits in a club. Any return by west now, will trap his partner’s H K. If east elects to discard on the S J, south exits in a club. East will be forced to ruff his partner’s winner and lead the H T, thereby allowing declarer to finesse the queen and claim ten tricks. The complete hands were:

Discussion: There were some interesting points in play as well as the bidding:

North opened with 1 D and not 1 C though he has three cards in each of them. On four-triple-three hands with the four-card suit being a major, it is advisable to open 1 D if there is a two-honour disparity. Like, for example, S A-Q-x-x H J-x-x D K-Q-J C x-x-x. Don't you want partner to lead a diamond should the opponents buy the contract?

West should have passed the second time too. His suit is ratty and he does not have a single trick to offer by way of defence. The 2 C bid actually instigated east to double the final contract. Though you can’t fault him entirely for the double, east should have remembered that his partner had originally passed his hand.

If both east and west had remained silent, as they should have, declarer would have had no chance whatever of making his contract.

It was good play by the declarer to tackle spades, the side suit , at trick two.

The defence could not prevent the endplay after declarer discarded a club from hand on the diamond winner, and a club from dummy on the fourth spade. Spectacular finish!

3NT would have been a lot easier!

E-mail: ls4bridge@gmail.com

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.