>> In the Op-Ed page interview, If unwittingly we err, history will not forgive us (Dec. 12, 2013), the second question — By opting to sit in opposition in Delhi, are you shying away from the task of delivering on your ideals? — and the answer to it, got merged in the answer to the first question. It was an editing error.
>> BJP report pitches for poll tie-up with TDP (Dec. 12, 2013) said the Parkal seat was won by the TRS by a margin of 20,000 votes. Actually, the margin of victory was 2,000 votes.
>>A sentence in Is keeping animals in captivity slavery? (S&T page, Speaking of Science column) read: “The state of Colorado in the U.S. wanted in 2008 to establish a law … be given the some constitutional rights that a human being enjoys.” It should have been same constitutional rights.
>>In the Business page report, Eli Lilly enters branded generics; launches four cancer drugs (Dec. 11, 2013), the name of one of the new drugs the company had launched was given as Ininotecan. It should have been Irinotecan.
Please specify the edition (place of publication), date and page.
The Readers' Editor's office can be contacted by
Telephone: +91-44-28418297/28576300 (11 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday to Friday);
Mail: Readers' Editor, The Hindu, Kasturi Buildings,
859 & 860 Anna Salai, Chennai 600 002, India.
All communication must carry the full postal address and telephone number.
No personal visits.
The Terms of Reference for the Readers' Editor