April 13, 2018 12:02 am | Updated 12:46 am IST
The graphic that accompanied the front-page report, “IPL matches shifted out of Chennai” (April 12, 2018), wrongly listed Rajkot as one of the four alternative venues suggested by the Board of Control for Cricket in India. It is Lucknow — as given in the text.
In the Op-Ed page article titled “A promise falls short” (April 12, 2108), there was a reference to the Suresh Koushal v Union of India case. It is Suresh Koushal v Naz Foundation .
Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.
We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.
