Tourism Minister discharged from wealth case

December 11, 2010 02:18 am | Updated 02:18 am IST - CHENNAI:

Tamil Nadu Tourism Minister N. Suresh Rajan. File photo

Tamil Nadu Tourism Minister N. Suresh Rajan. File photo

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court on Friday ordered that N. Suresh Rajan, Tamil Nadu Tourism Minister, be discharged from a disproportionate wealth case. Two others were also discharged.

The prosecution case was that Mr. Rajan, being a public servant committed an offence of criminal misconduct by acquiring and being in possession of pecuniary resources and property in his name and in the names of two of his relatives, including his mother, to the extent of Rs. 17.20 lakh as on May 14, 2001. This was disproportionate to the known sources of his income. Hence, he committed an offence punishable under section 13(2) read with 13(1)(e) of the Prevention of Corruption Act.

The Minister said despite his explanation, the Vigilance and Anti-Corruption unit, Nagercoil, filed a charge sheet before the Chief Judicial Magistrate-cum-Special Judge, Nagercoil.

The petitioners said they filed a petition before the trial court seeking discharge from the case. It was dismissed on September 25 last year.

In the order pronounced here, Justice Aruna Jagadeesan, said the properties in the names of Mr. Rajan's two relatives could not be held to be the properties belonging to the Minister in the absence of any investigation into the individual income of the relatives.

In the absence of any material to show that Mr. Rajan's money flowed into the hands of the other two persons, they could not be said to be holding the properties in their names on his behalf.

It was clear that the prosecution, instead of establishing the link between the assets acquired by Mr. Rajan and the individual income earned by him, clubbed the properties of the other two accused. There was no acceptable reason to club the properties to be considered as the property of the first accused. If the properties of the other two accused were excluded, there was no material to infer that the first accused held assets which were disproportionate to known sources of his income.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.