Why prop up RIL and let down NTPC, Kejriwal asks Manmohan

PM “sympathetic” to Reliance Industries’ demand for gas price revision

November 01, 2012 01:06 am | Updated November 16, 2021 09:57 pm IST - NEW DELHI:

NEW DELHI, 31/10/2012 : Indian against corruption activists Arvind Kejriwal (right) with Prashant Bhushan (left) addressing a press conference, in New Delhi on Wednesday. Oct 31, 2012. Photo: Shanker Chakravarty

NEW DELHI, 31/10/2012 : Indian against corruption activists Arvind Kejriwal (right) with Prashant Bhushan (left) addressing a press conference, in New Delhi on Wednesday. Oct 31, 2012. Photo: Shanker Chakravarty

India Against Corruption alleged on Wednesday that Prime Minister Manmohan Singh was batting for corporate houses, and the PMO was very “sympathetic” to Reliance Industries Limited’s demand for a revision in the gas price.

“RIL’s request for an increase in the gas price was turned down by the Petroleum Ministry under the leadership of Jaipal Reddy and the Empowered Group of Ministers (EGoM) during the past two years. The EGoM had fixed a price of $4.2 per Million Metric British Thermal Units (mmBtu) for RIL and others, valid till March 31, 2014. When Mr. Reddy refused to yield…, they [RIL] approached the Prime Minister, who was very sympathetic to their demand. The Prime Minister asked the Petroleum Ministry to seek the Attorney-General’s opinion whether the gas price could be increased midway…” Mr. Kejriwal told a press conference.

He said it was strange that neither the Prime Minister nor his office showed the same concern for, and sympathy with, NTPC when the state-run company was forced to accept a higher gas price from RIL. “Why was the Prime Minister not pulling up RIL for not producing 80 Million Metric Standard Cubic Metre Per Day [mmscmd] gas as per the agreement? Why did the Prime Minister not seek the Attorney-General’s opinion when the country’s interests were at stake and RIL went back on its commitment to supply gas to NTPC at $2.4 per Million Metric British Thermal Units? Why was the Prime Minister showing so much interest when RIL’s interests were at stake?”

He alleged that when RIL failed to meet its production targets, Mr. Reddy and his team of officials decided to disallow its capital expenditure. In the first instance, notice was sent to RIL for disallowance of $1 billion. This would mean a loss of $2.2 billion (Rs.11,000 crore) to RIL, if the interest multiple ratio was taken into account. Next year, the disallowance could be $1.5 billion, which would mean a loss of $3.3 billion to RIL. “Is this the reason why Mr. Ambani got restless…? The government seems to be succumbing to the illegitimate demands of some powerful corporate… Benefits given to RIL… contributed to the rise in the prices of power and fertilizers. On the one hand, the government says it does not have the Rs. 35,000 crore to subsidise LPG cylinders and on the other, it bends over backwards to provide benefits to such a corporate house.”

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.