When people are expecting Mullaperiyar issue to be resolved, ‘why aggravate situation’?
The Supreme Court on Thursday dismissed filmmaker Sohan Roy’s petition challenging a further extension of the ban by the Tamil Nadu government on screening of DAM 999 in the State.
A Bench of Justices P. Sathasivam, J.S. Khehar and Vikramajit Sen declined to interfere with the government order.
According to the petitioner, the movie is an emotional thriller and tribute to the souls lost in the world’s worst manmade dam disasters, and that it has nothing to do with the Mullaperiyar dam, an issue in dispute between Tamil Nadu and Kerala.
The petitioner said that on December 16, 2011 the State extended the suspension of exhibition of the movie, initially ordered for two weeks, to six months without any valid reason. On June 19, 2012, the ban was again extended by three months during the pendency of an earlier writ petition and it was further extended by three months in December.
Justice Sathasivam told counsel P.V. Dinesh and Deepak Prakash: “Legally you may be right. We are not underestimating your right…In your statement many things have come out. [The petitioner had stated before the authorities that the film had nothing to do with Mullaperiyar dam; if anything happens to the dam and if there is a breach, his relatives would be the first victim].”
Justice Sathasivam said: “The ban is only for three months, already one month is over. If there is a law and order problem, what will happen? You have already exhibited the film in other States. The court cannot ignore the apprehensions expressed by the State and consider only individual rights. The Tamil Nadu government says if the film is released, relations between the two States will be affected. When an elected government raises this issue, can the court ignore [it]?”
The judge further said: “The people are expecting this issue [of the Mullaperiyar dam] will be resolved. At this stage, why should we aggravate the situation not only in Tamil Nadu but also in Kerala? We can’t close our eyes to the objections and decide the case purely on legal aspects. We have to respect the sentiments of the people”.
The petitioner had said the Tamil Nadu government was approaching the issue with a prejudiced mind since he was a Kerala resident.
With Courts and State Governments beginning to ban movies from being released on various grounds,the poor producers are now a miserable lot with their resouces tied up in productions which may not see the light of the day in the immediate future.In a situation of this sort,Producers would be well advised to seek approval from State Governments,State High Courts,Supreme Court,
Religious leaders and any other authority I might have missed here, of the script before deciding to produce a movie.While at it a general approval from the Censor Board subject to a final okay may also be advisable.
When expert engineering committees have studied the dam and concluded it
to be safe, then the protest by the Govt of Kerala seems to be only
politically motivated without any engineering basis. The film is
obviously trying to capitalise on the unfounded fears of the people, and
would only worsen the situation. On the grounds of creating irrational
fear among the public, the film can be deemed as nothing but dangerous
propaganda.
I went through today's the hindu editorial and suprised to observe how the SC forgetting their own rulings and pursuing contradictory stands. Justifying the stand of TN government on banning 'Dam999' will vindicate their stand on banning 'Vishwaroopam'. Then SC will not be able to interfere with any law and order maintenances of the states
Please Email the Editor