Vijay Mallya declared proclaimed offender by Delhi court

The order was passed as he failed to appear before it despite repeated summons.

January 04, 2018 06:39 pm | Updated December 01, 2021 06:41 am IST - New Delhi

Vijay Mallya at Westminster Magistrates Court in London. File

Vijay Mallya at Westminster Magistrates Court in London. File

A Delhi court on Thursday declared beleaguered businessman Vijay Mallya a proclaimed offender for evading summons in a FERA (Foreign Exchange Regulation Act) violation case.

Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Deepak Shehrawat passed the order after noting that Mr. Mallya failed to appear before it despite repeated summons.

“In view that Vijay Mallya failed to appear before this court within 30 days, and no representation was made on his behalf, he is declared as proclaimed offender,” the court said.

On April 12 2017, the court issued an open-ended non-bailable warrant (NBW) against the liquor baron.

Unlike a non-bailable warrant, ‘open-ended NBW’ does not carry a time limit for execution.

On November 4, 2016, while issuing a NBW against Mr. Mallya, the court observed that he had no inclination to return and had scant regard for the law of the land.

It had said that coercive process has to be initiated against Mr. Mallya as he was facing proceedings in several cases and avoiding appearance in those matters.

The court had also held that Mr. Mallya’s plea that he wanted to return to India but was “incapacitated” to travel as his passport had been revoked by Indian authorities, was “mala fide” and “abuse of the process of law.”

“Incapacitated” to travel

Mr. Mallya, who is reportedly in London, had submitted before the court on September 9 that was “incapacitated” to travel despite “best intentions” as his passport had been revoked.

On July 9, the court cancelled the exemption from personal appearance granted to Mr. Mallya on an application of the Enforcement Directorate (ED) and directed him to appear before it on September 9. The exemption was granted to Mr. Mallya in December 2000.

The anti-money laundering agency had issued summons to the businessman in connection with alleged payment of $200,000 to a British firm for displaying Kingfisher logo during the Formula One World Championships in London and some European countries in 1996, 1997 and 1998.

It had claimed that the money was allegedly paid without prior approval of the Reserve Bank of India in violation of Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA) norms.

In its plea against Mr. Mallya, the ED had also sought issuance of non-bailable warrant against the chairman of the now defunct Kingfisher Airlines to ensure his presence in the ongoing trial of the case, which is at the final stage.

According to ED, Mr. Mallya was summoned on four occasions for questioning in connection with a contract signed in December, 1995 with London-based firm Benetton Formula Ltd. for promotion of the Kingfisher brand abroad.

When Mr. Mallya failed to appear before ED in response to the summons, a complaint was filed on March 8, 2000 before a court here and later charges were framed against him under FERA.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.