Plan to take over Pallava era temple dropped following opposition

Residents fear takeover will result in restrictions in construction in their area

September 05, 2013 01:34 am | Updated November 27, 2021 06:53 pm IST - CHENNAI:

The Sri Sthalasayana Perumal temple houses some of the oldest sculptures in Mamallapuram — Photo: K.V. Srinivasan

The Sri Sthalasayana Perumal temple houses some of the oldest sculptures in Mamallapuram — Photo: K.V. Srinivasan

Stiff opposition by residents has made the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) to drop plans to declare the Pallava era Sri Sthalasayana Perumal temple at the world heritage site in Mamallapuram, 60 km south of Chennai, as a protected monument for conservation of rare architecture and inscriptions in the temple that dated from Pallavas to Vijayanagara eras.

The decision, ASI sources said, has been taken by the Ministry of Culture based on the reports by the Directorate General of Archaeology and ASI at New Delhi due to strong opposition from the residents in Mamallapuram and repeated representations by the elected representatives from the Kancheepuram district, including local MP, P.Vishwanathan, to the ministry of culture against the ASI proposal.

“We have decided to drop the plan of takeover of the temple considering various factors including local opposition. We will get a formal communication from the headquarters soon,” said a senior ASI official.

Tracing the origin of efforts taken to conserve the temple, it was in 1974, the ASI suggested strict regulation around the Sthalasayana Perumal temple since it was closer to the famous Arjuna Penance sculpture and the other cave temples after the state government announced a grand plan to create a new town in Mamallapuram. Since then, many proposals for conservation of the temple have come up but nothing was materialized.

On May 20 in 2012, ASI issued a public notice requesting objections if any to the Union government's proposal to declare the ancient temple as a monument of national importance under section 4 of the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958. Subsequently, a series of events including hoisting black flags in houses and shops were organised by an action committee comprising residents, traders and political parties.

“We are not against conservation of our heritage. Restrictions imposed around protected monuments here have crippled our lives. We are against such restrictions and not against conservation,” said Mamallapuram town panchayat’s chairman, M. Kothandapani.

Residents feared that takeover by ASI will stop them from worshipping at the temple.

More importantly, they fear the move will be followed by more restrictions in terms of repairs and new construction works of their buildings around the temple area.

Fears of the residents, who live for centuries, has become real after the enactment of the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Site and Remains Amendment Act, 2010, that bans any construction or repair work of existing structures within 100 metres of a monument.

Interestingly, as most of the monuments are located within the 100 metres, the Act prohibits any construction and repair works in Mamallapuram.

At present, Brihadeeswarar temple in Thanjavur, Airavateswara temple near Kumbakonam, monuments in Mamallapuram and Gangaikonda Cholapuram temple at Jayakondam are world heritage sites in the state.

In Tamil Nadu, ASI has 248 monuments and 163 archaeological sites. At Mamallapuram, ASI maintains 32 monuments including Arjuna's penance and shore temple. But the ancient Perumal temple do not come under ASI purview and maintained by the Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments (HR&CE) Department of the state government since independence.

Built during eight century by Pallavas, the Sthalasayana Perumal temple has some of the most ancient sculptures in Mamallapuram. It is a small temple with two major shrines for Lord Sthalasayana Perumal and Nilamangai Thayaar. The temple is the birth place of Bhoothathazhwar, the 2nd Azhwar (Vaishanvaite saint).

During Chola periord, the temple was renovated by Chola king Vikrama Chola, in 1120AD as the structure got corroded due to salt laden by sea breeze.

Later, large tracts of land were allotted to mobilise revenue for the maintenance of the temple Telugu Cholas, Pandian kingdom, Samburayans and Vijayanagara rulers.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.