“No loss” to government on account of sinking structure

Contractor ready to demolish it, forego payment: Minister

April 08, 2010 01:20 am | Updated November 28, 2021 08:45 pm IST - CHENNAI:

The contractor, who is building slum board tenements at Ammankulam in Coimbatore, has agreed to demolish the ‘sinking' building and written to the government stating that he will forego his payment, Slum Board Development Minister Subha Thangavelan told the Assembly on Wednesday.

Replying to a special calling attention motion tabled by the AIADMK, Congress and Left parties, Mr. Thangavelan said there was no financial loss to the government and the contractor was willing to take up construction again if a new site was provided.

The strength of the building could be gauged from the fact that it was leaning, “but there is no crack in the structure.”

Soil testing was carried out by PSG Engineering College. All precautions were taken. The expert committee that looked into the ‘sinking' had opined there could have been a “loose packet” somewhere deep down.

He refuted the charge that the land was ‘Eri' poramboke and said it was ‘Nathan' poromboke.

There is a Supreme Court order against construction or allowing squatting on government land classified as catchment or water body.

Pointing this out, C. Govindasamy (CPI-M) asked how the government had wilfully violated a Supreme Court order and carried out construction on a water body. There was great fear among tenement dwellers in the city after the incident, he said and wanted the government to conduct a comprehensive enquiry and fix responsibility.

S.M. Velusamy (AIADMK) asked why the government chose to build at the same spot the AIADMK regime had rejected.

Stressing that the government should take responsibility for endangering lives of people, he said this happened because of the hurry in trying to complete the building as quickly as possible.

C. Gnanasekharan (Congress) wanted to know how the site was selected, where soil testing was done and if the building was built at the place from where the soil was sourced.

A. Tamilarasu (PMK) sought to know if engineers of the Slum Board had any explanation for the ‘sinking,' and if the government had fixed responsibility.

V. Sivapunniyam (CPI) wanted to know if all mandated rules were followed before construction. There was a general view that Slum Board buildings were badly constructed since only the poor resided in them.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.