HC clubs cases related to proposed govt. medical college in Karur

Cases to be posted for hearing before a Division Bench tomorrow

July 26, 2017 09:18 am | Updated 09:18 am IST - MADURAI

For Daily : Madurai:  A view of the Madras High Court Bench in Madurai. Photo: K_Ganesan.

For Daily : Madurai: A view of the Madras High Court Bench in Madurai. Photo: K_Ganesan.

The Madras High Court Bench here on Tuesday directed its Registry to club all writ petitions as well as public interest litigation petitions filed in connection with the location of a proposed Government Medical College Hospital in Karur district and post them for hearing before a Division Bench of Justices K.K. Sasidharan and G.R. Swaminathan on Thursday.

The First Division Bench comprising Chief Justice Indira Banerjee and Justice Pushpa Sathyanarayana issued the direction after it was brought to its notice, during the hearing of a PIL petition filed by M.N. Prabhu, a former AIADMK councillor, that two other writ petitions relating to the location of the proposed medical college were already pending before the court.

Presenting the PIL petitioner’s case before the First Bench, Senior Counsel Vijay Narayan stated that it was the endeavour of the State Government to establish a government medical college hospital in every district. Accordingly, former Chief Minister Jayalalithaa, had on August 12, 2014, announced the government’s decision to establish a college in Karur.

Subsequently, two residents of Karur — K.G. Prem and G. Pradeep Kumar — owning large tracts of land at Kuppichipalayam and other neighbouring villages, offered to donate a portion of their land for the college. However, the government authorities did not find those lands suitable for the college since they were situated far away from the district headquarters hospital.

Finally, it was decided to establish the college in the heart of Karur town in a land belonging to the municipality since it was very close to the district headquarters hospital.

The government also accorded financial sanction for ₹229.46 crore for the project but it could not take off due to impediments created by those who had offered to donate their lands, counsel pointed out.

Additional Advocate General B. Pugalendhi told the court that the construction work could not commence due to interim orders passed in two other cases pending before single judges of the High Court.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.