Alternatives will come a cropper, Central team told

October 07, 2012 04:25 pm | Updated November 17, 2021 04:55 am IST - Cuddalore

The central team led by R.K. Gupta, Chief Engineer, Central Water Committee, interact with Cauvery Delta farmers' association in Tiruvarur. Photo: B Velankanni Raj

The central team led by R.K. Gupta, Chief Engineer, Central Water Committee, interact with Cauvery Delta farmers' association in Tiruvarur. Photo: B Velankanni Raj

The Central team that visited the tail-end delta region on Sunday was given a graphic account of “why alternative crops in the delta region are not feasible and what are the lurking dangers of resorting to direct sowing.”

Rm. Kathiresan, Dean, Faculty of Agriculture, Annamalai University, made this observation while giving a scientific overview of the present crop situation in the terminal areas of the delta region, including Kattumannaroil and Chidambaram blocks, to the team led by R.K.Gupta, Chief Engineer of the Central Water Commission, at Chidambaram.

Mr. Kathiresan pointed out that the delta region was a predominantly rice growing area because of the soil and climatic conditions.

The south-west monsoon during normal times provided suitable conditions for raising the 105-day-long kuruvai crop. Of the average rainfall of 1,500 mm a year received by the delta region, south-west monsoon contributed only about 250–300 mm of rain and north-east monsoon the major chunk of 1,100–1,200 mm of rain.

Therefore, the south-west monsoon period was an ideal season for the paddy crops to attain full growth as ample amount of sunshine would also be available for inducing photosynthesis for the formation of grains.

Mr. Kathiresan said the research conducted by his faculty had clearly established the fact that in the region only paddy crop could be raised with such traceable rainfall during the south-west monsoon and none other crops.

Direct sowing

Mr. Kathiresan warned of a lurking danger in resorting to direct sowing. He said the undesired fallout of such a practice would be proliferation of the “weedy rice” in the farms.

The weedy rice was a wild relative of the cultivated rice (oryza sativa) that would flourish in the farms but would not bear any grains.

Since the weedy rice would consume all the nutrients and suppress the growth of the cultivated rice there would be drastic decline of up to 80 per cent in the yield level of the cultivated rice.

P.V. Srividya writes:

NAGAPATTINAM: Dry PWD channels, parched fields, broadcast seeds and the wilted grass of the occasional germinated field greeted the team members.

In Anandhamangalam, farmers showed mud strewn with seeds that had failed to germinate due to absence of rains. The team visited directly-sown fields in Sellur, Erukattancherry, Kazhiyappanallur and Annanperumalkoil and mapping fields from Velankanni up to Kollidam.

Against the normal cultivable area of 35,000 hectares in the Nagapattinam district for kuruvai, the area covered this year was 13,318 ha. Normally, the coverage under samba is 1.02 lakh ha. However, only 36,408 ha have been brought under the crop. The expected production loss was placed at 6.6 lakh tonnes, amounting to Rs.85.8 crore.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.