News » National

Updated: February 26, 2012 23:17 IST

Probe Devas deal afresh, Madhavan Nair asks PMO

Staff Reporter
Comment (4)   ·   print   ·   T  T  
G. Madhavan Nair
The Hindu+SEP+THE HINDU G. Madhavan Nair

The imbroglio over the Antrix-Devas deal has taken a new turn, with the former Indian Space Research Organisation Chairman, Madhavan Nair, writing to the Prime Minister's Office demanding a fresh probe into the space spectrum agreement and its subsequent termination last year.

Last month, Mr. Nair and three other scientists were barred from holding any government post for their role in the controversial January 2005 deal.

The Department of Space has been “misleading” the Space Commission and the government, says the letter written last week to Minister of State in the PMO V. Narayanasamy. The action against the ISRO scientists was “ill-conceived” and implemented “under a cloud of secrecy.”

Mr. Nair told The Hindu that he called for a comprehensive review of the rationale for cancelling the contract and also an assessment of the losses — financial and technological — caused by the cancellation.

Though an internal investigation done by the B.N. Suresh Committee gave the scientists a “clean chit” in June 2010, the DoS presentation to the Space Commission in July that year did not reflect the panel's findings, Mr. Nair said.

In his letter, he refuted the DoS' allegations on several counts. As for the charge that the Insat Coordination Committee (ICC) was not consulted on the deal that involved the building of two exclusive satellites for Devas, he says: “As per the Satcom policy, the ICC had authorised the Department of Space to lease out transponder capacity to private users.”

On the claim that the Cabinet was not informed of the ISRO's contract with Devas, he says the notes before the then Space Commission and the Cabinet were on the lines similar to any other proposal for funding new communication satellites. “It was never the practice to mention the name of specific private users in such proposals.”

Two other committees set up by the Centre, which probed the deal in 2011, found lapses in the agreement. While Mr. Nair didn't fault the B.K. Chaturvedi and Roddam Narasimha Committee report, he said the second team, headed by the former Central Vigilance Commissioner, Pratyush Sinha, “condemned” the scientists before they had an opportunity to “prove our innocence.”

Scientists in highly responsible position should be above boards. The
punishment given to Dr Madhavan Nair is, I think, symbolic and it is a
deterent for others to be careful in the execution of their
responsibilities. On similar lines, I am of the opinion that Prof. C N R
Rao should resign from his responsible position; it will be a lesson for
all those scientists who crave for multiplying their publications
ignoring ethics and also quality.

from:  M R Udupa
Posted on: Mar 2, 2012 at 14:28 IST

my sympathy is with whole scientist community since their contribution in development of nation is very much, but if someone has commited a mistake deliberately whoever it may be, should be punished.

from:  Prateek Jhajharia
Posted on: Feb 26, 2012 at 22:06 IST

He is fishing in muddled waters.

from:  Soundararajan Srinivasa
Posted on: Feb 26, 2012 at 20:10 IST

He has to contest in courts. He should not pester PMO for a new probe. If the one conducted is having short comings, he should go to court and prove his innocence. Blaming all is not in good light for a man who occupied a plum post.

from:  K. Sugavanam
Posted on: Feb 26, 2012 at 16:20 IST
This article is closed for comments.
Please Email the Editor

Swachh Bharat Mission

Tweet your opinions with #THCleanIndia. Take a look at how the mission has taken shape. Read more»


Tamil Nadu

Andhra Pradesh





Recent Article in National

Our crusade is moving in the right direction: Verma

Aditya Verma, locked in a legal battle against N. Srinivasan, has expressed high hopes of cricket being cleansed of corruption soon.... »