No let-up in firing on border, casualties mount

Since surgical strikes by Army on September 29, 13 security personnel have lost their lives

November 13, 2016 08:31 pm | Updated December 02, 2016 03:16 pm IST - NEW DELHI:

Srinagar,11/11/2016:Army jawans carry the coffin of  Hav Satnam Singh who had attained martyrdom, on 09 Nov 16 in Machil Sector, of Kupwara, North Kashmir.  PHOTO/SPECIAL ARRANGEMENT.

Srinagar,11/11/2016:Army jawans carry the coffin of Hav Satnam Singh who had attained martyrdom, on 09 Nov 16 in Machil Sector, of Kupwara, North Kashmir. PHOTO/SPECIAL ARRANGEMENT.

Gunner Harsit Bhadouria, who was injured in cross-border firing in the Keran sector of Jammu and Kashmir on Friday, has succumbed to his injuries. He is the sixth Army personnel to be killed in firing this month which shows the increasing intensity of ceasefire violations between India and Pakistan along the Line of Control (LoC) and the International Boundary (IB).

Army sources said that there have been over 130 instances of ceasefire violations on the LoC and according to BSF sources, over 180 violations occurred on the IB since the surgical strikes on September 29.

Since the surgical strikes, 13 security personnel have lost their lives. They include 10 Army soldiers along the LoC and three jawans of the Border Security Force (BSF) which guards the IB. Due to mortar shelling on civilian areas there were at least 15 civilian deaths so far, including three children, since the Uri terror attack on September 18 which claimed the lives of 19 soldiers.

Hinterland quiet

Army sources say that while the hinterland, which was rocked by protests and violence, has been relatively quiet, the border has become very active. The number of incidents and weapons used is reminiscent of the violence in 2014 and of 2002 when the border was active.

More than half the casualties this year on the Army’s side were after the surgical strikes. One officer observed that casualties do happen at this level of escalation and as heavier weapons are used. However, the concern has been that the losses are disproportionate. The Army says they are now inflicting “heavy casualties” on the Pakistani Army and their posts.

The real impact

“We are losing our men, but they are losing only terrorists. The real impact is not on the Pakistani Army. This is now changing,” one officer posted along the LoC said.

The bigger worry is there is no sign of reduction in the hostilities which is likely to push up casualties. “Pakistan shows no sign of reducing the firing. We will respond accordingly,” the officer added.

In 2003, a ceasefire came into force following which the guns largely fell quiet barring few occasional incidents. Since the surgical strikes, both sides have resorted to firing small arms and heavy mortars like 82mm and 120mm. However, both sides have so far not acknowledged using artillery though its use is suspected.

Pakistan’s claim

In a related development, the Inter Services Public Relations (ISPR) of Pakistan claimed in a statement last week that India had for the first time used artillery in the “current phase of escalation.”

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.