Mumbai gangrape: Police want accused to undergo identification parade

September 01, 2013 11:11 am | Updated November 16, 2021 09:21 pm IST - Mumbai

Mumbai 26/08/2013  Forensic expert team members from Delhi entering Shakti Mill on August 26, 2013.  22 year old photojournalist was gangrape on August 22, 2013 at Shakti Mill.  Photo:  Vivek Bendre

Mumbai 26/08/2013 Forensic expert team members from Delhi entering Shakti Mill on August 26, 2013. 22 year old photojournalist was gangrape on August 22, 2013 at Shakti Mill. Photo: Vivek Bendre

Mumbai police plans to conduct test identification parade of the five accused in the photojournalist gangrape case as soon as they are remanded in judicial custody.

“Currently all the five arrested accused will remain in police custody till September 5. When they are produced before a court on the last day, we would seek further custody of the culprits,” a Crime Branch official said.

“However, if we do not get extension in the police custody and the accused are sent to judicial custody, then we would immediately go for identification parade,” he said.

According to the officer, the investigators were determined to complete all the legal procedures at the earliest and file the charge sheet so that the accused are handed down the highest punishment at the earliest.

The 23-year-old photojournalist was sexually assaulted at a defunct and deserted Shakti Mills compound in Parel area on the evening of August 22, when she had gone there on an assignment with a male colleague.

As per the procedure, during the test identification parade (TIP), a group of persons including one suspected of having committed a crime are assembled to see if the victim and eyewitnesses can identify the suspect.

As per law, the TIP is conducted when the accused are in judicial custody and lodged in jail.

One of the accused in the case is a minor while the four other accused were identified as Shiraz Rehman Khan, Vijay Jadhav, Kasim Bengali and Salim Ansari.

The five were booked under IPC sections 376(D) (rape), 342 (wrongful confinement), 506(2) (criminal intimidation), 377 (Unnatural offence) , 201 (Causing disappearance of evidence of offence), 120 (B) (criminal conspiracy) and 34 (common intention to commit an offence).

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.