The Law Minister alleged that Mr. Alexander's statement was motivated by disappointment over not being considered for Presidentship.
Law Minister M. Veerappa Moily today attacked a top aide of Rajiv Gandhi for suggesting that the then prime minister may have had a role in the release of former Union Carbide chief Warren Anderson accused in Bhopal gas case, saying he was a new convert to BJP-Shiv Sena camp.
“I think he (P. C. Alexander) had joined BJP, and with Shiv Sena’s support he became a Rajya Sabha member. He is a new convert to the BJP-Shiv Sena and anti-Congress camp because he was not considered for Presidentship. It is a motivated statement,” he told reporters here.
He said many persons like Mr. Alexander, former principal secretary to Rajiv Gandhi, suddenly wanted to be martyrs. “I think he is responsible (for Anderson’s sudden release after his arrest in December 1984) because he was the then Principal Secretary,” he added.
Mr. Alexander had hinted that Rajiv Gandhi may have had a role in the release of Anderson as the then prime minister could have agreed with the decision on letting him off.
Mr. Moily said there was need for a law to fix responsibility on persons responsible for disasters such as the Bhopal gas tragedy.
He said the CBI which investigated the worst ever industrial tragedy that claimed thousands of lives booked cases under IPC section 302, but the supreme court converted it into 304 A (culpable homicide which provides for lesser punishment). “Unfortunately the judiciary did it,” he said.
Mr. Moily said the Government was working on codifying laws to ensure that disasters were treated as disasters only.
He also said the Government was working on a set of guidelines that would facilitate fast tracking of cases related to major disasters in the light of the Bhopal case.
“Our courts are very conservative. Hence we are working on new set of laws to deal with such disasters”, Mr. Moily said.
Referring to the case against former chief of Union Carbide Warren Anderson, he said it had not been closed. “We are pursuing it.”
When his attention was drawn to Anderson’s wife saying that her husband was too old, he said everyone was equal in the eyes of law and age did not matter.