Jat violence: Leaders must pay for damage, says SC

‘Agitations cannot hold the nation to ransom and be a reason to vandalise public property’

February 25, 2016 02:13 am | Updated 10:14 am IST - NEW DELHI:

Agitations cannot hold the nation to ransom and be a reason to vandalise public property, the Supreme Court said on Wednesday. Organisers of such agitations will have to pay the cost.

The court’s resolve hit home after the widespread Jat quota agitation saw killings, burning and looting of shops, and mobs destroying canals supplying water to the National Capital. The Haryana government reeled under losses worth several thousands of crores and the Army was brought in to protect public property.

Equal accountability A Bench of Justices J.S. Khehar and C. Nagappan said parameters should be laid down to pin the blame on organisers and make them pay compensation for agitations which slipped into uncontrolled mob violence against innocents and their property.

“What is happening? Where is our country heading? You cannot burn the country’s property. You can agitate peacefully. But what is all this burning and ransacking? Those who do it must know that there will be consequences for their actions,” the Bench said.

Stressing that equal accountability should be applicable to all, the court said: “Whether it is the BJP or the Congress or whichever organisation or party, it may be asked to pay for the property damaged. They will collect the money and pay for the damage.”

The Bench was hearing a plea by quota agitation leader Hardik Patel to quash charges of sedition against him. Gujarat had also witnessed violence and public property loss during the Patidhar agitation. The police had lodged a case in October against Mr. Patel and five of his aides on the charges of sedition and waging war against the government.

The apex court had on January 14 asked the AG to assist it on the approach to be adopted in dealing with cases where public property was damaged on a large scale. Hardik has claimed that the charges had been wrongly been invoked against him.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.