Court issues notice to woman in Kerala ‘godman’ attack case

Following flip-flop by 24-year-old, it asks if she can undergo narco analysis

June 20, 2017 11:05 pm | Updated June 21, 2017 07:55 am IST - Thiruvananthapuram

Gangeshananda

Gangeshananda

A special court here on Tuesday issued a notice to the 24-year-old law student suspected of having slashed the genitals of her “sexual aggressor,” a 54-year-old godman, asking her whether she was willing to take a narco analysis test.

The police on Monday moved the Protection of Children From Sexual Offences (POCSO) court here to put the woman through the test after they perceived an abrupt reversal in her stance.

‘Reversal’ of stand

Their case was that she had ‘flip-flopped’ on her sworn statement that the godman, Gangeshananda, alias Hari, had repeatedly raped her since she was 14. Hari, who has been charged under the POCSO Act, was a regular visitor at her house since 2008.

Woman’s counsel Anita Jacob said her client reserved the right to file an objection petition. The crime occurred at her house on May 21.

The police said the woman had “reversed” her statement in a letter she purportedly wrote to Hari’s lawyer Sasthamangalam Ajith. The contentious document debunked the police version that Hari was to blame for the assault and the woman had acted in self-defence to halt “years of sexual abuse.”

Shadowy instigator

They hinted at the involvement of a shadowy instigator and a larger conspiracy to “punish” Hari for his role in the campaign to “regain the birthplace” of 19th century seer Chattambi Swamy from its legal owner, a police officer.

A forensic examination of the clothes the woman was wearing at the time of the assault had “turned up no leading biological evidence pointing to sexual abuse”, according to the police.

The woman, who said crime was a desperate act to halt years of sexual abuse, had refused to be medically examined. However, the fingerprints lifted from the assault weapon, a knife, matched those of hers.

The case took another turn on Monday with the woman’s acquaintance, a man she “blamed” for instigating the attack in her purported letter, moved a habeas corpus petition in the High Court stating that the law student was under illegal detention. The Crime Branch is scheduled to take over the probe soon.

The court has rejected Hari’s bail application.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.