Bar bribery case: HCraps VACB officer

Asks govt. to file report on appointment of special prosecutor

March 08, 2017 07:35 pm | Updated 07:35 pm IST - KOCHI

The Kerala High Court on Wednesday slammed the Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Bureau (VACB ) for filing two statements, one through a special prosecutor, and another through the senior government pleader in response to former Finance Minister K.M. Mani's petition against the Thiruvananthapuram Vigilance Court order for a further probe into the bar bribery case.

When the petition came up for hearing, K.P. Satheesan, lawyer, claimed that he had been appointed as special public prosecutor for conducting the case before the High Court. However, it was questioned by the counsel for Mr. Mani on the ground that the appointment of a special public prosecutor for conducting cases in the High Court could be made only under the Section 24(1) of Criminal Procedure Code and that too after consultation with the High Court.

The court then said that the matter required examination as to whether the appointment of special public prosecutor was in accordance with the procedure prescribed under the law and whether such appointment was possible at the very preliminary stage of investigation.

The court further observed that whether there was a special prosecutor or not, the important question was how two statements happened to be filed by the same investigation officer through two different counsel. The court added that “such games cannot be allowed here.”

As an investigation officer, he must be honest, sincere and responsible. After having signed a statement on March 1, 2017, he should necessarily have informed the public prosecutor (senior government pleader) about filing of such a statement when he signed a second one on March 6, 2017. “This sort of irresponsible procedure cannot be allowed.”

The court directed the investigation officer to appear in person before the court on March 27 to explain the circumstances under which the two statements were filed and state who instructed or directed him to file the two statements.

The court also directed the State government to file a report regarding its definite stand on the appointment of the special public prosecutor.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.