Govt departments should comply with Cabinet policy decisions: SC

September 05, 2015 02:12 pm | Updated March 28, 2016 03:37 pm IST - NEW DELHI

In a judgment drawing the line for bureaucrats in policy making, the Supreme Court held that government departments should follow the policy decided by their political masters in the Cabinet and not evolve contrary ones of their own.

The Supreme Court held that government should not be seen to speak in two voices.

“The government shall speak only in one voice. It has only one policy. The departments are to implement the government policy and not their own policy,” a judgment delivered by a three-judge bench of Justices Anil R. Dave, Kurian Joseph and A.K. Goel held.

Sending a strong message that contrary outcomes to policy decisions owing to disparity at political and departmental levels may unsettle industry, the judgment authored by Justice Kurian said “what is given by the right hand cannot be taken by the left hand.”

The judgment dated September 3 was based on an appeal filed by Lloyd Electric and Engineering Limited against Himachal Pradesh Excise and Taxation Department barring it from benefitting from the State Cabinet's decision to extend its 2004 Industrial Policy, allowing concessional rate of Central Sales Tax (CST) at one per cent.

The Cabinet extended the 2004 Policy beyond March 31, 2009 till March 31, 2013. However, the State Excise and Taxation Department's notification on the Cabinet decision was delayed and issued only on May 29, 2009.

Subsequently, the government department insisted that industrial units, including Lloyds, are not eligible for concessional CST in the interim two-month period between the Cabinet decision and the actual issuance of the notification in May 2009.

“Once the Council of Ministers has taken a decision to extend the 2004 Industrial Policy and extend tax concession beyond March 31, 2009, merely because the Excise and Taxation Department took some time to issue the notification, it cannot be held that the eligible units are not entitled to the concession till the Department issued the notification,” the court held.

The judgment said the State government is bound by the policy decision taken by the Council of Ministers.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.