Global response to Ebola inadequate, says WHO

Despite severity of problem, essential surveillance, laboratory, data management, and other capacities were not in place

January 19, 2015 02:39 am | Updated December 04, 2021 11:29 pm IST - NEW DELHI:

The WHO also recommends having in place capacities for early detection of emerging and epidemic-prone diseases and adequate response mechanisms to become “an integral part of well-functioning health systems.”

The WHO also recommends having in place capacities for early detection of emerging and epidemic-prone diseases and adequate response mechanisms to become “an integral part of well-functioning health systems.”

The World Health Organisation (WHO) has cautioned that no single control intervention is sufficient to bring an epidemic of the scale and complexity of Ebola under control.

Assessing the global response to the Ebola outbreak and suggesting steps forward, the WHO has published 14 papers that assess the conditions that led to the spread of the deadly virus that has killed over 8,000 people in the affected regions.

It notes that the response to the virus was inadequate and despite the severity of the problem, “essential surveillance, laboratory, data management, and other capacities” were not in place in many of the member states.

“As the Ebola outbreak has revealed, the world did not respond to these recommendations, with none of these measures fully in place to support a response that could last for many more months to come ... As a result, the WHO went into battle against this virus with no army of reinforcements to support a sustained response, [and] no war chest to fund a surge, and [with] weapons that date back to the Middle Ages,” it says.

Control measures

To ward off future outbreaks, it has suggested all control measures to work in synchronism. It has also cautioned that countries with weak health systems and meagre basic public health infrastructure cannot withstand sudden shocks such as Ebola.

“Under the weight of Ebola, health systems in Guinea, Liberia and Sierra Leone collapsed. People stopped receiving — or stopped seeking — health care for other disease, like malaria, that cause more deaths yearly than Ebola,” the WHO has said in the paper “Ebola response: what needs to happen in 2015.”

Pointing out how preparedness, including a high level of vigilance, helps, the WHO cites the cases of Nigeria, Senegal and Mali where good surveillance and laboratory support allowed them to take swift action and prevent the virus from gaining a foothold.

Community engagement

Community engagement has been identified as the “one factor that underlies the success of all other control measures.” It describes contact tracing, early reporting of symptoms, adherence to recommended protective measures, and safe burials as critically dependent on a cooperative community.

The WHO also recommends having in place capacities for early detection of emerging and epidemic-prone diseases and adequate response mechanisms to become “an integral part of well-functioning health systems.”

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.