Court starts hearing on chargesheet against Sajjan afresh

September 17, 2010 08:14 pm | Updated November 28, 2021 09:29 pm IST - New Delhi

New Delhi: 1984 anti-Sikh riots case accused Congress leader Sajjan Kumar leaves after appearing in Karkardooma court in New Delhi on Wednesday. The court granted him bail. PTI Photo(PTI3_10_2010_000146B)

New Delhi: 1984 anti-Sikh riots case accused Congress leader Sajjan Kumar leaves after appearing in Karkardooma court in New Delhi on Wednesday. The court granted him bail. PTI Photo(PTI3_10_2010_000146B)

A Delhi court today started hearing arguments afresh on a chargesheet prepared by Delhi police against senior Congress leader Sajjan Kumar in a 1984 anti-Sikh riots case.

District Judge S. K. Sarvaria heard part arguments on behalf of the prosecution on an application filed by it seeking a direction with regard to the chargesheet against Kumar, former outer Delhi MP.

The chargesheet against Kumar in the 1984 anti-Sikh riots case citing sufficient evidence to proceed against him was prepared but never brought before a judge to seek his prosecution.

“The chargesheet was prepared in the case based on FIR number 67/87 at Nangloi police station here, naming Sajjan Kumar as an accused on April 8, 1992, but it was kept in the police file and never brought before the court,” Special Public Prosecutor told the court.

The FIR was clubbed with another riots case in which the trial was already on, he said.

Senior counsel H. S. Phoolka, appearing for the riot victims, submitted the chargesheet should be filed before the concerned court and summons issued against the accused to face the trial.

The Special Prosecutor, appointed by the Delhi High Court to deal with the 1984 riots cases, also told the court that the chargesheet specifically mentioned that there was sufficient evidence to proceed against Kumar but no action was taken against him stating that his arrest might create law and order problem.

The court adjourned the matter for October 19 as Additional DCP Rajiv Ranjan, who had investigated the matter, expressed his inability to appear before it due to his engagement with security preparedness for the Commonwealth Games.

During previous hearings, Mr. Ranjan, who appeared before the court to give an explanation on the matter, had said the two cases relating to the incidents were clubbed on the legal opinion provided by the prosecution branch.

The prosecutor had claimed the police were not empowered to club cases and it was the sole prerogative of the court to decide such issues.

An FIR was registered in 1991 with regard to the killing of five persons in Nangloi in the riots that took place in the aftermath of the assassination of the then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi on October 31, 1984.

Kumar, along with five others, was mentioned as an accused in the case but the police dropped the name of the politician.

This case was clubbed with another FIR (no 67/87) with regard to the killing of four persons in which Kumar was the sole accused. The police prepared the chargesheet in this case but never produced it before the court to seek prosecution of the accused.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.