Court rejects Mayawati’s plea on Ambedkar memorial

December 01, 2009 12:31 pm | Updated December 17, 2016 05:20 am IST - New Delhi

B-37, LKO-260601  - JUNE 26, 2009 - Lucknow: A view of statues of UP Chief Minister Mayawati and dalit icons at Ambedkar Sthal in Lucknow on Friday which was inaugurated by the Chief Minister on Thursday evening,  a week before the schedule. PTI Photo by Nand Kumar NICAID:110677869

B-37, LKO-260601 - JUNE 26, 2009 - Lucknow: A view of statues of UP Chief Minister Mayawati and dalit icons at Ambedkar Sthal in Lucknow on Friday which was inaugurated by the Chief Minister on Thursday evening, a week before the schedule. PTI Photo by Nand Kumar NICAID:110677869

The Supreme Court on Tuesday declined to grant any relief to Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Mayawati for carrying out maintenance and cleaning work at the Rs. 2600 crore-Ambedkar site in Lucknow.

Justice H S Bedi, who was heading the Bench, also at one stage threatened to recuse from the matter after senior counsel Abhishek Manu Singhvi pleaded that the matter be heard by a three-judge bench that included Justice Aftab Alam.

The Bench also comprising Justice P S Thakur said the UP government’s plea for carrying out maintenance and cleaning work at the site to mark Ambedkar’s anniversary on December six cannot be entertained as the petitioner Mithilesh Kumar Singh has not filed his response.

The apex court said that since the matter is being posted for hearing to January 20, the UP government’s plea cannot be entertained at this stage and hence, has become infructuous.

However, after the matter was adjourned, Mr. Singhvi submitted that the hearing should be conducted by a three judge bench including Justice Alam, who was part of the earlier bench which had heard the matter at length.

This submission irked Justice Bedi, who offered to recuse if either parties do not have faith in him.

“This is not a matter for you to decide. Whether it is a two or three judge bench, it is for the Chief Justice to decide,” he said.

“It is very unfortunate Dr Singhvi, you have been long enough here to know the procedure. You have been here for longer than many of us. You are very unkind to us,” Justice Bedi said.

Following this, Mr. Singhvi tendered an apology to the court and said he would make the appropriate request to the Chief Justice of India as per the procedure.

He clarified that the plea for inclusion of Justice Alam was made by him as the judge heard the matter at length for several days with Justice B N Aggarwal, who has since retired.

Justice Alam was one of the judges who pulled up the UP government and expressed total dissatisfaction at the government’s affidavit denying construction activities at the site despite the stay put by the apex court.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.