Coal scam: Court directs CBI to furnish CVC reference

February 03, 2015 03:35 pm | Updated November 16, 2021 05:35 pm IST - New Delhi

CBI was on Tuesday directed by a special court to produce the original reference made by the Central Vigilance Commission (CVC) on the basis of which the agency had registered a case against M/s Prakash Industries Limited and others in a coal blocks allocation scam.

Special CBI Judge Bharat Parashar also asked the probe agency to place before it on February 19 the preliminary enquiry file of the case in which it had later on filed a closure report.

“Arguments on the final report have been further heard.

It has been directed that the original reference made by the CVC besides the preliminary enquiry file be produced on the next date of hearing. Put up on February 19 for consideration,” the court said.

During the hearing, CBI told the court that FIR was lodged on the basis of a preliminary enquiry conducted by it on the reference of the CVC.

The court was hearing the matter in which CBI had filed a closure report, saying no prosecutable evidence could be found during its investigation in the case.

CBI had earlier lodged an FIR against Prakash Industries Ltd and various others in connection with alleged irregularities in allocation of Chhattisgarh’s Fatehpur coal block.

According to CBI, the Fatehpur coal block was allocated jointly to Prakash Industries Ltd and one other company by the 35th screening committee.

The FIR in the case was lodged against Prakash Industries Ltd, its three top officials, some officials of the Ministry of Coal and others alleging that the firm had misrepresented its net worth while applying for the Fatehpur coal block.

The FIR was registered in the case for offences punishable under sections 120—B (criminal conspiracy) read with 420 (cheating) of the IPC and under the provisions of Prevention of Corruption Act.

The agency had alleged that the company had misrepresented facts relating to its net worth, while the screening committee deliberately did not follow the guidelines and showed undue favour to the firm.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.