SEARCH

News » National

Updated: August 7, 2014 11:18 IST

Beyond the debate, govt. accepts 65% Indians are poor

    Rukmini S
    M.K. Venu
Comment (2)   ·   print   ·   T  T  
Rag pickers near a canal in Vijayawada. While the Opposition pillories the plan panel formula of poverty, the government has begun moving to a broader and more realistic de facto definition. File photo
The Hindu Rag pickers near a canal in Vijayawada. While the Opposition pillories the plan panel formula of poverty, the government has begun moving to a broader and more realistic de facto definition. File photo

National poverty line will stand at a per capita expenditure of around Rs. 50 per day in rural areas and Rs. 62 in urban areas

While the Opposition pillories the Planning Commission for using a formal definition of poverty that ensures the percentage of people below the poverty line is lower than what it ought to be, the government has begun moving to a broader and more realistic de facto definition that will include roughly 65 per cent of the population. This notional poverty line will stand at a per capita expenditure of around Rs. 50 per day in rural areas and Rs 62 in urban areas.

As first reported by The Hindu, the Planning Commission has revised the official poverty headcount ratio down from 37 per cent of the total population in 2004-5 to 22 per cent of the population in 2011-12.

These poverty rates come from applying the Suresh Tendulkar committee’s methodology for estimating poverty to draw a poverty line, and using the National Sample Survey Organisation’s consumption expenditure data for 2011-12 to see what proportion of the population falls below these lines.

While Planning Commission-derived poverty lines and estimates have been all-important in the past because they are used to draw up BPL lists and allot entitlements, their inappropriateness today is demonstrated by the fact that the government itself is now moving away from using these numbers altogether. Following the Union Cabinet’s clearing of the National Food Security Ordinance, the Planning Commission has estimated that subsidised foodgrain entitlements will cover 67 per cent of the population. Simultaneously, economists advising the Ministry of Rural Development have told The Hindu that the exclusion criteria to be derived from the ongoing Socio-Economic and Caste Census are likely to leave out the top 35 per cent of the population while the bottom 65 per cent will be considered BPL.

“This is a step away from the narrow definition of poverty we have been using, where the line is really what I call a ‘kutta-billi’ line; only cats and dogs can survive on it,” said N.C. Saxena, member of the National Advisory Council, who headed a Planning Commission panel on poverty that recommended automatic inclusion and exclusion criteria. Rural Development Minister Jairam Ramesh said last year that the government was moving towards universalising its social protection schemes, and the Public Distribution System and pensions remained the only schemes that still relied on BPL criteria, Mr. Saxena added. A World Bank study of India’s social protection schemes had shown that universal schemes were far better at actually reaching the poor than those targeted at the poor.

By covering 67 per cent of the population, the government is in effect drawing the poverty line 85 per cent higher than what it is currently drawn at, Planning Commission member Saumitra Chaudhuri told The Hindu. By 2011-12 consumption expenditures, this works out to roughly Rs.1,506 monthly per capita expenditure — or Rs. 50 per day — for rural areas, and Rs. 1,850 per month — or Rs. 62 per day — for urban areas. While India’s poverty line has usually corresponded with the World Bank’s definition of extreme poverty, which is $1.25 (in Purchasing Power Parity terms) per person per day, the new notional poverty line would correspond more closely with the Bank’s definition of moderate poverty. The $2 line corresponded with Rs. 45 per day in rural India and Rs. 57 per day in urban India in 2011-12, Bank representatives said on Wednesday.

“It’s important to remember that those who aren’t poor in our country can still be very disadvantaged,” Mr. Saxena said. The Hindu’s analysis of the new NSSO consumption expenditure data shows that 90 per cent of rural Indians spend less than Rs. 70 per day, while 90 per cent of urban Indians spend less than Rs. 154 per day.

More In: National | News

"The Hindu’s analysis of the new NSSO consumption expenditure data
shows that 90 per cent of rural Indians spend less than Rs. 70 per
day, while 90 per cent of urban Indians spend less than Rs. 154 per
day." - This article.

I agree with this estimate. Because of high food inflation, this "Rs
spent per day on consumption" must be linked to the cost of 1800
calorie meals a day in a given place in a given time.

Most Indians (top 5-10%) who live in great comfort and style ask, "Why
are 90% Indians poor even after 66 years of Independence?" It's very
evident that comparing to China, our population exploded, and most are
poorly educated and badly skilled. Most Indians are great liability to
the economy instead of being an asset. The scientific output or the
patent per capita of our "highly educated population" is also very
dismal. India has neither sufficient "Innovative Capital" nor
"Consumption Constraints". We consume plenty of gold, gasoline,
iPhones and jeans, and our Re is drowning!

from:  Yamaka
Posted on: Jul 26, 2013 at 21:24 IST

It is very very sad to note the state of affairs of the country. Even after sixty five years of independance we are one of the poorest countries of the world. Why and why? It is the politicians, the looters and the scoundrels who led us down the golden path into the dungeon. Today the policians say one can have meal for one rupee or five rupee. One congress man says one have a good meal in Mumbai for twelve rupees. And his fellow congress cronies vouch the veracity of his claim. Where do the people wine and dine ? In the grand halls of Taj's, Sheraton's and Oberoi's. And who pays for them ? the starving slum dwellers of Dharavi. As long as the callous politicians rule the rooster in India, poor people of India do not have a prayer to have one proper square meal. Sad and sad indeed.

from:  Dr. B. Duraiswamy
Posted on: Jul 26, 2013 at 06:31 IST
This article is closed for comments.
Please Email the Editor

International

Tamil Nadu

Andhra Pradesh

Karnataka

Kerala


O
P
E
N

close

Recent Article in National

Prime Minister Narendra Modi talks with Vice President Joe Biden as Secretary of State John Kerry speaks during a luncheon at the State Department in Washington on Tuesday. Photo:AP

Modi lunches with Kerry, Biden on final day

After solid, half-day of parleys on economic policy, counterterrorism cooperation and much more, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi is... »