Loksatta finds fault with Tharoor on village development

June 01, 2013 06:58 pm | Updated 06:58 pm IST - Hyderabad

A file picture of Loksatta Party president Jayaprakash Narayan. Photo: Nagara Gopal.

A file picture of Loksatta Party president Jayaprakash Narayan. Photo: Nagara Gopal.

Lok Satta Party on Saturday found fault with Union Minister of State for Human Resources Development Shashi Tharoor’s contention that Mahatma Gandhi’s concept of a village-centric development model was “unrealistic” in the current age of globalisation and communication.

“Mr. Tharoor was blurring the distinction between economic self-reliance and self-governance. In the contemporary globalised world, no nation, leave alone a village, can be self-reliant,” N Jayaprakash Narayan, Lok Satta President, said in a statement in Hyderabad.

Mr. Tharoor, a Congress MP from Kerala, had made his remarks at a management conference in Panaji on Friday.

“Despite their technological prowess, even highly developed countries like the US, Germany and China are dependent on countries around the world for raw materials, products and services.

“Such interdependence enables every nation to reap the benefits of comparative advantage,” the bureaucrat-turned-politician said.

Economic interdependence was, however, different from self-governance, he noted, adding local governments not only in countries like the US and Germany but also in China were all powerful.

Even in India, villages and municipalities - when armed with powers, resources and personnel - have recorded spectacular development, said Mr. Narayan, who is also an MLA.

He said decentralisation of powers and devolution of resources on local communities and making them accountable would contribute to India’s progress, prosperity and peace.

“It will lead to the emergence of a crop of new leaders and not necessarily the sons and daughters of present day politicians.”

He said when they have control over resources, local communities could prioritise works depending on their needs.

In contrast, when power was centralised, those at the helm throw priorities to winds and focus on vote-fetching schemes.

Decentralisation would thus put an end to fiscal profligacy too, Mr. Narayan noted.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.