Lives of key witnesses in illegal mining case in danger: CBI

Agency says it wants more time to investigate vital clues given by Gali’s personal assistant

November 23, 2012 03:43 pm | Updated November 17, 2021 05:09 am IST - HYDERABAD:

Key witnesses in the illegal mining case involving former minister of Karnataka Gali Janardhan Reddy were being threatened by his supporters, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) argued in a special court while opposing his bail petition here on Thursday. As Mr. Reddy was an influential and powerful person, he could hamper the investigation in the case badly if he was enlarged on bail, counsel for CBI B. Ravindranath contended.

He cited the incident of burning a vehicle belonging to key witness C. Sashi Kumar (LW8) on November 20 in Kadapa district and quoting the FIR he alleged that it was burnt by Janardhan Reddy’s followers to threaten Mr. Kumar.

Provided security

Two other witnesses B. Anjaneya (LW2) and H. Mallikarjuna (LW4) were also threatened earlier and along with Mr. Kumar they had written to CBI seeking protection to their lives. They were provided security after CBI forwarded the letters to Superintendents of Police (SPs) concerned, the CBI counsel explained.

Further, Mr. Ravindranath insisted that CBI required more time to investigate vital clues given by Mehfuz Ali Khan, personal assistant of Janardhan Reddy, during his custodial examination. Investigation would not be completed until the Supreme Court disposed of a petition on the boundary dispute on mining licenses given to Obulapuram Mining Company (OMC) and others as the extent of illegally mined iron ore could be quantified only after the boundary issue was settled.

Defence contention

Defence counsel B. Vijaysen Reddy contended that the CBI could not seek denial of bail to his client indefinitely without stating time-frame for completion of the investigation.

He appealed to the court not to consider the incidents occurred days before the hearing of bail petitions as they could be creation of miscreants to deny bail to his client.

Principal Special Judge U. Durga Prasada Rao reserved the orders for November 26 after conclusion of arguments by both sides.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.