2G case: CBI moves Delhi HC against acquittal of Raja, Kanimozhi

March 20, 2018 06:16 pm | Updated December 01, 2021 12:30 pm IST - New Delhi

A May 30, 2014 combo photo of former Telecom Minister A. Raja (left) and DMK MP Kanimozhi at the Patiala House Courts complex in New Delhi.

A May 30, 2014 combo photo of former Telecom Minister A. Raja (left) and DMK MP Kanimozhi at the Patiala House Courts complex in New Delhi.

The CBI on Tuesday moved the Delhi High Court challenging a special court order acquitting former Telecom Minister A. Raja, DMK MP Kanimozhi and others in the 2G spectrum allocation scam case.

The matter was mentioned before a Bench of Acting Chief Justice Gita Mittal and Justice C. Hari Shankar by Additional Solicitor General (ASG) Tushar Mehta.

The court allowed it to be listed for hearing on March 21.

The Enforcement Directorate (ED) had on March 19 moved the Delhi High Court against acquittal of Mr. Raja, Ms. Kanimozhi and others in a money laundering case arising out of the 2G scam.

The special court on December 21, 2017 acquitted Mr. Raja, Ms. Kanimozhi and others in the cases registered by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and the ED.

Besides Mr. Raja and Ms. Kanimozhi, the special court had acquitted 17 others, including DMK supremo M. Karunanidhi’s wife Dayalu Ammal, Shahid Balwa and Vinod Goenka of STPL, Asif Balwa and Rajiv Aggarwal of Kusegaon Fruits and Vegetables Pvt. Ltd., film producer Karim Morani, P Amirtham and Director of Kalaignar TV Sharad Kumar in the ED case.

 

The ED, in its charge sheet, had alleged that ₹200 crore was paid by Swan Telecom (P) Ltd. (STPL) promoters to DMK-run Kalaignar TV .

On the same day, the trial court had acquitted Mr. Raja, Ms. Kanimozhi and 15 others, including former Telecom Secretary Siddharth Behura, Raja’s erstwhile private secretary R.K. Chandolia, Swan Telecom promoters Shahid Usman Balwa and Vinod Goenka, Unitech Ltd. MD Sanjay Chandra and three top executives of Reliance Anil Dhirubhai Ambani Group (RADAG) — Gautam Doshi, Surendra Pipara and Hari Nair, in the CBI’s 2G case.

The CBI had alleged that there was a loss of ₹30,984 crore to the exchequer in allocation of licences for 2G spectrum which were scrapped by the top court on February 2, 2012.

Special Judge O.P. Saini had held that the prosecution had “miserably failed” to prove the charges.

The special court, which was set up on March 14, 2011 for hearing 2G cases exclusively, had also acquitted Essar Group promoters Ravi Kant Ruia and Anshuman Ruia and six others in a separate case arising out of the 2G scam probe.

The first case, prosecuted by the CBI, had 17 accused, while the second matter, pursued by the ED, had 19 accused. The third one had eight accused including Essar promoters.

In the CBI case, Mr. Raja, Ms. Kanimozhi and 15 others were tried under provisions of the IPC and the Prevention of Corruption Act dealing with offences of criminal conspiracy, cheating, forgery, using as genuine fake documents, abusing official position, criminal misconduct by public servant and taking bribe.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.