U.S. intelligence chief out; who's next in hot seat?

May 22, 2010 03:17 pm | Updated December 16, 2016 03:02 pm IST - WASHINGTON

“For months, National Intelligence Director Dennis Blair has been a dead man walking” and he knew it. So constant and vicious were the leaks from the White House and Congress of his imminent departure that he opened a recent speech on intelligence reform with a joke that his replacement would be Washington Redskins football quarterback Donovan McNabb.

The crowd’s laughter was just a little uncomfortable, as Mr. Blair himself spotlighted the elephant in the room by suggesting that even the just—traded professional football star was being mentioned to fill the job.

Everyone seemed to know this just was not working.

His 16—month tenure had been studded with public intelligence failures, turf wars and humiliating leaks to the press.

Mr. Blair’s official decision to step down came on Thursday after a meeting with President Barack Obama, according to two senior congressional staffers. They said it became clear by the end of the meeting that Mr. Blair had “lost the confidence of the president.”

In a message to his work force, Mr. Blair said his last day would be May 28.

“It is with deep regret that I informed the president today that I will step down as director of national intelligence,” Mr. Blair said.

Mr. Obama released a brief statement on Thursday night that did not acknowledge Mr. Blair’s impending resignation.

Praise for intelligence community

“During his time as DNI, our intelligence community has performed admirably and effectively at a time of great challenges to our security, and I have valued his sense of purpose and patriotism,” the president said. “He and I both share a deep admiration for the men and women of our intelligence community, who are performing extraordinary and indispensable service to our nation.”

Mr. Blair, a retired Navy admiral, is the third director of national intelligence, a position created in response to the failure to prevent the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

His departure highlights the continuing disarray and competition among the disparate elements of the intelligence community” the very same issues the September 11 Commission identified and that the national intelligence director was supposed to make a thing of the past.

Two other government officials said several candidates already had been interviewed for the DNI job, which is to oversee the nation’s 16 intelligence agencies.

Possible candidates

Names mentioned as possible candidates include current top White House counterterrorism adviser John Brennan and James R. Clapper, the defence undersecretary for intelligence. All the officials spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the issue.

Mr. Blair’s term in office was marred by turf battles with CIA Director Leon Panetta and Mr. Blair’s own controversial public comments after the failed Christmas Day jetliner bombing attempt.

The two congressional officials said Mr. Blair had been on a losing streak since he squared off with Mr. Panetta last May over Mr. Blair’s effort to choose a personal representative at U.S. embassies to be his eyes and ears abroad, instead of relying on CIA station chiefs, as had been the practice.

Mr. Blair issued a directive declaring his intention to select his own representatives overseas. Mr. Panetta followed up shortly thereafter with a note telling agency employees that station chiefs were still in charge” a move that some construed as insubordinate and a blow to Mr. Blair’s authority.

The White House did nothing to back Mr. Blair over Mr. Panetta, which sent a message to the rest of the intelligence community that Mr. Blair could be ignored, according to one senior congressional staffer. Worse, the skirmish ended up costing Mr. Blair the support of Mr. Brennan, who resented being forced to mediate, according to another staffer familiar with the issue.

In the failed Christmas Day attack, the Senate Intelligence Committee found that the National Counterterrorism Centre was in a position to connect intelligence that could have prevented it. As director of national intelligence, Mr. Blair oversaw the centre.

One senior Senate staffer said it was apparent Mr. Blair had been kept on the periphery of the FBI’s investigation into the Nigerian suspect in the attempted plane bombing, Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab.

Mr. Blair’s later testimony before Congress did not endear him to the White House, the officials said, when he acknowledged that an elite interrogation team known as the High—Value Interrogation Group had not been deployed to question Abdulmutallab. Mr. Blair may have further damaged himself by admitting that he had not been consulted on whether the HIG unit should have been used.

The HIG team was deployed after the Times Square bombing attempt this month, administration officials said this week.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.