U.K. "paranoid" about U.S. ties

December 04, 2010 08:27 am | Updated November 22, 2021 06:52 pm IST - London

United Kingdom's Secretary of State for Defence Liam Fox with U.S. Defence Secretary Robert M. Gates at the Pentagon, on June 29, 2010. According to the leaked U.S. cables, Liam Fox had promised to buy American military equipment while the Foreign Secretary, William Hague, offered the U.S. Ambassador a "pro-American" government.  Photo: AP

United Kingdom's Secretary of State for Defence Liam Fox with U.S. Defence Secretary Robert M. Gates at the Pentagon, on June 29, 2010. According to the leaked U.S. cables, Liam Fox had promised to buy American military equipment while the Foreign Secretary, William Hague, offered the U.S. Ambassador a "pro-American" government. Photo: AP

Leaked diplomatic cables from the American embassy in London show how senior Tory figures including William Hague, now Foreign Secretary, and Liam Fox, the Defence Secretary, bent over backwards to promise they would run a “pro-American regime” if they came to power.

They also shed light on Britain's “paranoia” over its so-called “special relationship” with America, a topic that apparently became a butt of jokes in American diplomatic circles. “Excessive” speculation in Britain over the future of the “special relationship” after Barack Obama became President prompted one senior American diplomat to note that such anxiety “would often be humorous if it were not so corrosive”.

Churchill bust

The “paranoia” was so deep, according to the WikiLeaks documents published by The Guardian on Saturday, that when a bust of Winston Churchill that the former Prime Minister, Tony Blair, had presented to the then U.S. President George W. Bush was removed from the Oval office after Mr. Obama's inauguration it was seen in London as a snub.

A cable in February 2009 from the U.S. deputy chief of mission Richard LeBaron said: “More than one [U.K.] senior official asked embassy officers whether President Obama meant to send a signal in his inaugural address about U.S.-U.K. relations by quoting Washington during the revolutionary war, while the removal of the Churchill bust from the Oval office consumed much U.K. newsprint. This period of excessive U.K. speculation about the relationship is more paranoid than usual. This over-reading would often be humorous, if it were not so corrosive.”

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.