U.K. being sued over U.S. drone attacks

March 12, 2012 08:49 pm | Updated September 30, 2016 10:42 pm IST - LONDON

In this March 19, 2011 photo protesters chant slogans during a rally in Peshawar to condemn U.S. drone attacks in the Waziristan tribal regions. A Pakistani national whose father was killed in a drone attack is suing the British government for providing intelligence to the U.S.

In this March 19, 2011 photo protesters chant slogans during a rally in Peshawar to condemn U.S. drone attacks in the Waziristan tribal regions. A Pakistani national whose father was killed in a drone attack is suing the British government for providing intelligence to the U.S.

A Pakistani national whose father was killed in a U.S. drone attack in North Waziristan last year is suing the British Government accusing it of providing intelligence to Americans that assisted them in launching the attacks.

Noor Khan (27) holds the British government responsible for his father’s death. His father Malik Daud Khan was killed when a meeting of tribal leaders, known as the “jirga”, was bombed by Americans. He was among the 40 people killed.

Human rights lawyers acting for Mr. Khan said on Monday that a case naming Foreign Secretary William Hague would be filed in the High Court. They claimed that they had “credible, unchallenged” evidence that Mr. Hague oversaw a policy of passing British intelligence to U.S. forces planning attacks against militants.

They would argue that British intelligence officers who gave information enabling Americans to launch the attack may be liable as “secondary parties to murder”.

The case is said to be aimed at forcing Britain to clarify its policy with regard to providing intelligence that could be used to kill people.

“What has the government got to hide? If they’re not supplying information as part of the CIA’s illegal drone war, why not tell us? And if they are, they need to come clean, and stop colluding in a campaign that has killed hundreds of civilians,” said Clive Stafford Smith, Director of rights group, Reprieve, which is backing the case.

The Foreign Office declined to comment.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.