Rajat Gupta (63), the former Goldman Sachs Director and McKinsey and Company Managing Partner convicted of supplying confidential information to jailed hedge fund boss Raj Rajaratnam, received a two-year jail term from U.S. Judge Jed Rakoff, even as one of the most spectacular insider-trading cases on Wall Street since the financial crisis of 2008 drew to a climax. He was also ordered to pay a fine of $5 million.
In June 2012 a jury convicted Mr. Gupta on four criminal felony counts of conspiracy and securities fraud related to his passing on material non-public information on Goldman Sachs to Mr. Rajaratnam, who is himself currently serving out an 11-year jail term.
While some raised eyebrows at the length of the prison term, Judge Rakoff said that Mr. Gupta was “a good man,” and that his court “has never encountered a defendant whose prior history suggests such an extraordinary devotion, not only to humanity writ large, but also to individual human beings in their times of need.” Yet he added, “But the history of this country and the history of the world is full of examples of good men who did bad things.”
In a formal statement in court Mr. Gupta said, “The last 18 months have been the most challenging of my life since I lost my parents as a teenager... I regret terribly the impact on my family, friends and institutions that are dear to me.”
Charges specifically stemmed from allegations that Mr. Gupta placed a call to Mr. Rajaratnam after learning that Goldman Sachs had approved a $5-billion investment by Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway Inc. As part of its crackdown on impropriety on Wall Street the U.S. Justice Department pressed the case against the Kolkata-born graduate of Harvard Business School since October last year and he is one among 23 individuals who faced criminal charges in connection to Mr. Rajaratnam’s Galleon Hedgefund.
While prosecutors in the case, led by Indian-American U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara, argued for a minimum of ten years in prison for Mr. Gupta, defence lawyer Gary Naftalis asked Judge Rakoff for probation and leniency, noting that Mr. Gupta was willing to shoulder a community service sentence in rural districts of Rwanda entailing work with local healthcare programme to combat HIV, malaria, poverty and food insecurity.
After sentencing Mr. Bharara said, “Rajat Gupta now must face the grave consequences of his crime - a term of imprisonment. His conduct has forever tarnished a once-sterling reputation that took years to cultivate. We hope that others who might consider breaking the securities laws will take heed from this sad occasion and choose not to follow in Gupta's footsteps.”
Defence lawyers also noted that a lengthy prison sentence would undermine Mr. Gupta’s support for new development initiatives, such his work with the Urban Institute of India, aimed at bringing “the private sector, academia and the Indian government together to address accelerating migration to India's cities.”
In issuing his sentence the judge may have assigned weight to the fact that Mr. Gupta reportedly did not gain personally in terms of material benefit, from tipping off Mr. Rajaratnam during a phone call shortly after a Goldman board meeting. Mr. Rajaratnam, contrarily, was said to have made $75 million off the trades he made based on the information gleaned from Mr. Gupta.
Mr. Gupta, who may have the option to request permission to remain out of prison until his case is heard by the Second Circuit Appeals Court for New York‘s Southern District, also received close to 400 letters of support from high-profile associates praising his philanthropic work, including Microsoft Chairman Bill Gates and former United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan.
Mr. Gates was quoted as saying that while he was “not in a position to comment on any of the particulars of the case against him... [he wanted] to round out Rajat's profile as you consider the appropriate sentence for him.” Mr. Annan similarly said, “I urge you to recognise Rajat for the good he has done in the world, to give him the credit that he deserves for helping others and to take into account his efforts to improve the lives of millions of people.”
Judge Rakoff, however, is likely to have faced the complex task of balancing these dimensions of Mr. Gupta’s case with prosecutors’ arguments that his insider trading and conspiracy were “shocking” and that his “crimes are extraordinarily serious and damaging to the capital markets.
Keywords: Rajat Gupta case, securities fraud, insider-trading cases





In my opinion, Mr Gupta got away easy on this case. He has to pay a 5
million dollar fine (too easy for someone close to a billionaire) and
serve 2 years in a minimum security prison.
A case of spill over of Indian brand of corruption
if every citizen of india unites and educates all his fellow men about
the kind of justice that is seen in developed countries, be sure this
country will change. arvind kejriwal is trying to do it. but support of
people is must. finally, you have to follow someone who is talking
against corruption and also practising it. anna hazare and arvind
kejriwal have the strength to change india. people should come out in
large numbers and remove the evils in india.
He got away lightly with the punishment. A lifetime of goodwill tarred,
hope he uses his brilliance for the betterment of the poor.
When such speedy justice and even that of someone so highly placed will
happen in India ?
Mr Gupta should have received maximum prison term of 10 years. By giving
him reduced term, Judge has demonstrated that big financial crimes get
smaller punishments. Nevertheless, Mr. Gupta, after so much academic and
professional accomplishments has become a criminal felon.
Wish US judge had utilised his brilliance, and routed it to community service.
If he was given punished to run drowning companies\NGO\UN missions, in backward states of the world for 5-10 years. Then those states would have also benefited by the punishment and his brilliance.
This kind of community service could surely be saviour for few.
Is my opinion worong ?
Yet another "Indian" success story that eventually ends up bringing disgrace. I wonder how many people that were openly proud of such an "Indian" achievement will come forward to own up that they were wrong about this person.
At an early stage of the investigation, a civil proceeding that would result in a fine was offered to Gupta by the SEC. In his arrogance, Gupta rejected the offer and the case was handed over to the federal prosecutor. With a two-year sentence of imprisonment Gupta gets away lightly.
What a pity.
A well thought out judgement.
In my opinion, a judgement should be a precise exercise displaying the ability of a
balanced mind to make a considered decision and come to a sensible conclusion
while interpolating the given information on hand with the needs, aspirations,
emotions, expectations and the perceptions within the different cross-sections of
a healthy society.
A process worth emulating in our society too!
Gupta is lucky and the judge has been kind. Perhaps it is because his
friend Rajratnam, who got the benefit, is spending 11 years behind bars.
How nice it would have been, is such quick justice system prevailed in
India. Our investigation agencies and the Judiciary have a lesson to
learn.
Is there not a single case of insider trading in India ?
As per Indian standards this is not a very serious crime while America doesn't believe so. A great country needs great laws and enforcement. That is what is democracy.The time has come for some heads to roll in India too.
Please Email the Editor