Pistorius should get psychiatric evaluation: Prosecutor

May 13, 2014 06:10 pm | Updated November 16, 2021 08:04 pm IST - PRETORIA

The chief prosecutor in the murder trial of Oscar Pistorius on Tuesday asked that the double-amputee runner be placed under psychiatric evaluation after an expert witness testified that he had an anxiety disorder.

Prosecutor Gerrie Nel noted that a psychiatrist for the defence had testified that the disorder she diagnosed in Pistorius may have played a role in his fatal shooting of girlfriend Reeva Steenkamp in his home on Feb. 14, 2013. The prosecutor has acknowledged that an evaluation of Mr. Pistorius’ state of mind at a government facility could mean the trial, which began March 3, will be delayed.

Judge Thokozile Masipa ordered an adjournment and said she would rule on Mr. Nel’s request on Wednesday morning.

Mr. Nel questioned why the defence decided to ask Dr. Merryll Vorster, a psychiatrist, to testify on behalf of the Olympic runner. He has suggested that the trial is not going well for Mr. Pistorius and that his lawyers are floating the idea that a disorder contributed to Steenkamp’s shooting and that therefore Pistorius bears less responsibility for her death.

Mr. Pistorius says he mistook Steenkamp for an intruder when he shot her through the closed door of a toilet cubicle. Prosecutors say he killed her in anger after an argument.

In asking for another professional evaluation of Mr. Pistorius’ mental state, Mr. Nel appeared to be trying to ward off any attempt by the defence to say Mr. Pistorius should be treated favourably by the court because of a mental condition linked to his disability.

Mr. Pistorius’ chief lawyer, Barry Roux, said at the start of defence-led testimony that the double amputee’s vulnerability and disability was at the centre of his case of a mistaken killing. He said Mr. Pistorius should not be sent for 30 days of psychiatric evaluation and that he wanted to call another witness to continue testimony.

The psychiatrist, Vorster, met Mr. Pistorius this month, prompting the prosecutor to question whether the timing of her late entry to the stable of defence witnesses signified a change in tactics by the defence, which has said Mr. Pistorius fired out of fear that he was about to be attacked.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.