Little progress in western talks with Taliban

Deadlock in dialogue could impact planned drawdown of foreign troops

June 10, 2011 02:56 am | Updated December 04, 2021 11:05 pm IST - WASHINGTON, D.C./NEW DELHI

A newly graduated member of the Afghan National Police receives his graduation certificate on Thursday. The deadlock in talks with the Taliban could impact the scale of western troop cuts, which are scheduled to coincide with the handover of several provinces to Afghan forces.

A newly graduated member of the Afghan National Police receives his graduation certificate on Thursday. The deadlock in talks with the Taliban could impact the scale of western troop cuts, which are scheduled to coincide with the handover of several provinces to Afghan forces.

Little progress has been made in negotiations with the Taliban despite several months of contact between western governments and interlocutors for the Islamist group, diplomatic sources have told The Hindu .

The apparent deadlock could impact the scale of the first phase of western troop cuts, which are scheduled to coincide with the handover of several less-troubled provinces to Afghan forces next month. General David Petraeus, who commands the 1,32,000-strong International Security Assistance Force (ISAF), is expected to soon present a detailed plan for the drawdown.

Negotiators, the sources said, had deadlocked on several issues — among them, the setting up of a Taliban office in the Persian Gulf state of Qatar. Taliban interlocutors insisted the office has the status of a diplomatic mission of the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan, as the Taliban calls itself. The United States, however, was unwilling to concede any form of diplomatic recognition for an organisation whose forces remain locked in combat with its troops.

So far, Taliban interlocutors have also proved unwilling to discuss concrete confidence building measures between the two sides — for example, agreement on ending attacks on civilian infrastructure in southern Afghanistan or area-specific ceasefires.

“These started off as talks about talks,” a senior U.S. diplomat said, “and we're still talking about talks. That has led to at least some suspicion that the Taliban simply sees this dialogue as a means to ease military pressure on its leadership, hoping that the ISAF will pull out completely by 2014.”

Indirect negotiations

Part of the problem is that the dialogue has been conducted through Kabul-based functionaries of the Taliban regime, which ruled Afghanistan from 1996 to 2001— not insurgent commanders.

The key figures include Mullah Muhammad Zaeef, Taliban's former ambassador to Pakistan, Wakil Ahmad Muttawakil, its foreign minister, and Abdul Hakim Mujahid, its representative to the U.S. until 9/11.

Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence has also facilitated contacts with a second layer of interlocutors claiming links to Taliban's supreme leader Mullah Muhammad Omar and its top decision-making body, the Quetta Shura.

Key among them is Abdul Gani Baradar, Mullah Omar's deputy, who was captured by Pakistani forces in February, 2010, after he opened direct negotiations with the Afghan authorities. Baradar was subsequently released, and has since travelled to Afghanistan for meetings.

Mullah Omar's spokesperson Tayyib Agha, who was also reported to have been in arrested in Karachi in March last, is again said to have met with the Afghan authorities on behalf of Mullah Omar.

The former head of the Taliban government, Mullah Abdul Kabir, is reportedly involved in the dialogue. Kabir, German journalist Willi Gerund revealed last year, was living in “a beautiful house close to the Pakistani town of Nowshera in the North West Frontier Province and placidly driving around in a posh SUV with a diplomatic number plate.”

Publicly, the Taliban has denied it is seeking negotiations, saying in the February issue of its house magazine that no negotiations could be “conducted with the lackey government and the fifth column so long as it is embraced in the lap of wicked America and while American flags are flapping above the peaks of this Muslim land.”

“Frankly,” said a senior British official connected with the dialogue process, “none of us have any idea of what the Quetta Shura's decision-making calculus in fact is.”

Early western enthusiasm for the dialogue process was tempered by the discovery that an interlocutor it believed to be Mullah Akhtar Muhammad Mansour, a key member of the Quetta Shura, was in fact an entrepreneurial shopkeeper unconnected to the insurgency.

Afghan President Hamid Karzai has, however, been pushing for the lifting of the United Nations sanctions, imposed after 9/11, on Taliban-linked figures in a bid to kick-start the dialogue process. They include Mullah Qalamuddin — chief of the notorious Department of Prevention of Vices and Promotion of Virtue, which brutally enforced Taliban edicts.

Fierce resistance to these concessions is being spearheaded by leaders from northern Afghanistan, notably Abdullah Abdullah, who stood against Mr. Karzai in the recent presidential elections, and Amarullah Saleh, former intelligence chief. Last month's assassination of General Daud Daud, a key leader of the anti-Taliban Northern Alliance, fuelled fears that a resurgent Taliban would seek to take over the country.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.