G7 stand united on Syria

But powers fail to agree on sanctions against Russia

April 11, 2017 09:48 pm | Updated 09:48 pm IST - London

Italian Foreign Minister Angelino Alfano, left, welcomes Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs Boris Johnson, before a meeting of foreign ministers of the G7 in Lucca, Italy, Tuesday, April 11, 2017. Foreign ministers from the Group of Seven industrialized nations are expected to call for a new international push to end the war in Syria as they end a meeting in Italy Tuesday.  (Riccardo Dalle Luche/ANSA via AP)

Italian Foreign Minister Angelino Alfano, left, welcomes Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs Boris Johnson, before a meeting of foreign ministers of the G7 in Lucca, Italy, Tuesday, April 11, 2017. Foreign ministers from the Group of Seven industrialized nations are expected to call for a new international push to end the war in Syria as they end a meeting in Italy Tuesday. (Riccardo Dalle Luche/ANSA via AP)

Foreign Ministers of the Group of Seven (G7) countries and several other West Asian countries spoke with one voice at a meeting in Lucca, Italy, condemning last week’s chemical attack in Syria that left 89 people dead. The U.S. and its allies hold Syrian President Bhashar al-Assad responsible for the attacks.

The G7 also lent support to the U.S. for its attack on the Syrian government-controlled Shayrat airfield in Homs province last Thursday.

While the G7 united to isolate Mr. Assad diplomatically and urged Russia to do the same, no agreement was reached on sanctions against Russia for supporting the Syrian regime.

British Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson had sought support for additional financial sanctions against specific individuals from Russia and Syria, but failed to secure the support of the G7 for his proposal. “There is no consensus at this time for new sanctions as an efficient method to reach our goal,” Italian Foreign Minister Angelino Alfano said.

No dramatic change

Some experts believe that the chemical attack and the U.S. strike may not change the situation in Syria dramatically. “We are likely to find that the major calculations of the U.S., Russia and other international actors with a major interest in Syria haven’t really been altered fundamentally,” Tim Eaton, a specialist on West Asia at the London-based think tank, Chatham House, told The Hindu on Tuesday. “What really shouldn’t be lost is that one form of really egregious weaponry is unlikely to be used by the [Syrian] regime again. So while we are not seeing the Syrian conflict come closer to a resolution over this, I think it is still important to note that that is a minor success.”

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.