Shanghai mulls One Dog Policy

Pet-owners spare no expense in grooming animals

November 11, 2010 11:11 pm | Updated November 12, 2010 09:14 am IST - BEIJING:

(101016) -- HEFEI, Oct. 16, 2010 (Xinhua) -- Dog handler Zhu Zhengxiang plays with a Labrador retriever named Lady at the Anhui Dog Training School on the outskirt of Hefei, capital of east China's Anhui Province, Oct. 8, 2010. Since the training school was established in 2007, more than 200 pet had been trained here. Training for pet dogs in China has been much more popular than before. (Xinhua/Wang Lei)

(101016) -- HEFEI, Oct. 16, 2010 (Xinhua) -- Dog handler Zhu Zhengxiang plays with a Labrador retriever named Lady at the Anhui Dog Training School on the outskirt of Hefei, capital of east China's Anhui Province, Oct. 8, 2010. Since the training school was established in 2007, more than 200 pet had been trained here. Training for pet dogs in China has been much more popular than before. (Xinhua/Wang Lei)

For decades, families in China have had to carefully adhere to the strict guidelines of the One Child Policy.

In the sprawling metropolis of Shanghai, this controversial and unpopular rule will soon be expanded to an unlikely member of Chinese households — their four-legged residents.

A draft “One Family, One Dog” law being reviewed by the city's legislature will now limit dog-owners to raising only one dog at home.

The draft cited Shanghai's high population density and limited living space as the reasons behind the proposal, the China Daily reported on Thursday.

With a growing middle-class, an increasing number of Chinese — particularly in more affluent cities, such as Shanghai — have become pet-owners, a once reviled bourgeois attribute in the days of Mao Zedong. China now has a booming pet industry with more than 5,000 pet products according to one report, and a generation of pet-owners who spare no expense in grooming and doting over their animals.

Unsurprisingly, the draft law has evoked strong criticism from Shanghai residents, who say the measures are impractical in a city with few dog shelters and resources for residents to turn to.

The draft law, in some sections, reads strangely similar to family planning regulations. Those breaking the law will be fined 1,000 yuan, or around Rs. 7,000 (far less than the average 20,000 yuan or Rs. 1.4 lakh families have to cough up for a second child). If dogs have puppies, owners will have to give them away to government-approved agencies.

“The rule is unfair and just doesn't make any sense,” Shanghai resident Jessie Zheng, who owns a 7 year-old Pomeranian, told The Hindu over telephone. “The only valid argument is the question of limited space in Shanghai. But if homes are big enough, there should be no issue. And most importantly, this is a question for families to decide, not the government.”

The only silver-lining for dog-owners like Ms. Zheng is the draft law brings down the high registration costs pet-owners currently face. In China, dogs have to be registered with the local government – a licence costs around 2,000 yuan (Rs. 14,000). As a result of the high costs, most dog-owners do not register their pets (and only walk them at night). According to official figures, Shanghai has 800,000 dogs, though only a quarter are registered.

The One Dog Policy, expected to take effect next year, ironically comes into force just as the city begins moving away from the One Child Policy. Faced with an ageing problem, the Shanghai government last year began encouraging couples who are both only-children to have a second child.

Ms. Zheng, an only child, said the One Dog Policy was unfair on humanitarian grounds too. She said, “Dogs need dog-friends too.”

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.