Russian plane crash probe rules out explosion

“A terror attack doesn’t always involve an explosion,” he said. “Along with an explosion on board, there could have been some mechanical impact.”

December 29, 2016 04:59 pm | Updated 05:08 pm IST - MOSCOW:

A Tupolev Tu-154 stands on the tarmac of the Chkalovsky military airport north of Moscow, Russia in January 15, 2015 file photo (Photo only for representation purpose).

A Tupolev Tu-154 stands on the tarmac of the Chkalovsky military airport north of Moscow, Russia in January 15, 2015 file photo (Photo only for representation purpose).

Flight recorders revealed no evidence of an explosion on board a Russian plane that crashed, killing all 92 on board, but investigators haven’t ruled a deliberate mechanical impact to down the plane, a military official said Thursday.

Russian air force Lt.Gen. Sergei Bainetov, who heads the Defense Ministry commission conducting the crash probe, said that a cockpit conversation recorder contained the captain’s words that indicated a “special situation” that began unfolding on board the plane.

Lt. Gen. Bainetov wouldn’t elaborate on what may have led to the crash, but noted that it likely had been caused by several factors.

The Tu—154 of the Russian Defense Ministry crashed into the sea early Sunday, moments after taking off in good weather from the city of Sochi. It was carrying members of the Alexandrov Ensemble, widely known as the Red Army Choir, to a New Year’s concert at a Russian military base in Syria.

Lt. Gen. Bainetov said that the plane crashed 70 seconds after takeoff from an altitude of 250 meters (820 feet) while it was traveling at a speed of 360—370 kilometers per hour (224—230 miles per hour).

“After deciphering the first flight recorder we have made a conclusion that there was no explosion on board,” Lt. Gen. Bainetov said at a news conference.

But asked if that means that investigators have ruled out a terror attack, Lt. Gen. Bainetov said “we aren’t ruling that version yet.”

“A terror attack doesn’t always involve an explosion,” he said. “Along with an explosion on board, there could have been some mechanical impact.”

Lt. Gen. Bainetov’s words appeared to contradict a previous statement from Russia’s top domestic security and counter—terrorism agency, the FSB, which has said it found “no indications or facts pointing at the possibility of a terror attack or an act of sabotage.”

It said investigators were looking into whether the crash might have been caused by bad fuel, pilot error, equipment failure or objects stuck in the engines.

Investigators have taken samples from a fuel tank used to fill the plane, which flew from Moscow’s Chkalovsky military airport and stopped in Sochi for refueling.

In an apparent attempt to downplay Lt. Gen. Bainetov’s statement, Russian Transport Minister Maxim Sokolov emphasized that “the version of a terror attack isn’t being considered as the main version.”

Mr. Sokolov said search teams have completed the bulk of efforts to recover bodies and debris from the crash site. He said 19 bodies and more than 230 body fragments have been recovered, adding that 13 big fragments of the plane and about 2,000 smaller fragments also have been pulled from the seabed.

Lt. Gen. Bainetov said that flights of the military’s Tu—154s have been suspended during the investigation but said they will likely resume after the investigation is over.

The Tu—154 is a Soviet—built three—engine airliner designed in the late 1960s. Russian airlines decommissioned the noisy, fuel—guzzling aircraft years ago, but the military and other government agencies continue using the plane, which is still loved by crews for its maneuverability and sturdiness.

The plane that crashed Sunday was built in 1983 and underwent factory checkups and maintenance in 2014, and earlier this year. Investigators have taken relevant documents from the plant that did the job.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.