Mindset over Metro must change: HC

Says project is in public interest, but at the same time, authorities must work to reduce inconvenience

October 31, 2017 12:47 am | Updated 12:47 am IST

Speeding things up:  The MMRCL has told the High Court that it has drafted a proposal to ensure that the work is finished expeditiously

Speeding things up: The MMRCL has told the High Court that it has drafted a proposal to ensure that the work is finished expeditiously

Mumbai: The Bombay High Court said on Monday that “everyone needs to change their mindset” about the noise and nuisance caused by work on the Metro 3 corridor.

A Division Bench of Chief Justice Manjula Chellur and Justice M.S. Sonak was hearing a petition filed by advocate Robin Jaisinghani against the noise caused due to the construction activity and said that it exceeds safe limits under noise rules. He also sought compensation of ₹10,000 each per day for his wife, his children and himself for the hardship caused to them.

The plea said, “There are no fixed hours during which construction activity is carried out. Sometimes, construction activity is carried out till midnight and sometimes even later till the early hours of the morning, making it impossible to carry out any normal activity.”

The court said both citizens and authorities need to change their attitudes.

“The Metro project is in public interest ... at the same time how much the authorities can reduce the inconvenience and problems caused to public because of the construction work is also important. Everyone needs to change their mindset ... everyone needs to come out of their respective attitudes and perceptions,” Chief Justice Chellur said.

She posted the matter to be heard on November 2.

On August 11, while hearing the same plea, the court had directed Mumbai Metro Rail Corporation Limited (MMRCL) not to carry out any construction or ancillary work related to the Metro from 10 p.m. to 6 a.m.

On Monday, Advocate General Ashutosh Kumbhakoni, appearing for the MMRCL, told the court that the corporation had drafted a proposal to ensure that the work is finished expeditiously and inconvenience is reduced. The MMRCL will soon meet Mr. Jaisinghani and advocate Zal Andhyarujina, appointed as amicus curiae to assist the court in the matter, to discuss the proposal, he said.

Second petition

Hearing another petition filed by Mr. Jaisinghani, raising concerns of fire hazards due to the Metro project work in Cuffe Parade, the bench directed fire brigade officials to inspect the buildings concerned and submit a report by November 2.

Mr. Jaisinghani has said that in the event of a fire in the buildings near the site, barricades put up for the construction work would make it difficult for fire engines to enter the premises.

Aarey case

Meanwhile, the court posted a petition challenging the construction of the Metro rail car shed in Aarey Colony for hearing on November 6. The petition says Aarey Colony is an eco-sensitive zone and no construction should be carried out there.

— With PTI inputs

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.