HC comes to the rescue of Royapuram station building

The court's comments came during hearing of a PIL based on a report published in “The Hindu” on June 22, 2013.

July 10, 2016 12:00 am | Updated November 17, 2021 11:02 am IST - CHENNAI:

The Madras High Court said that the Railways could expand the station while preserving the heritage portion. Photo: B. Jothi Ramalingam

The Madras High Court said that the Railways could expand the station while preserving the heritage portion. Photo: B. Jothi Ramalingam

The Madras High Court has made it clear that there is an order prohibiting the Southern Railway from disturbing the heritage building of Royapuram Railway Station even for any expansion works.

The First Bench of Chief Justice S.K. Kaul and R. Mahadevan made the observation while closing a PIL plea moved by advocate S. Sathia Chandran in 2013 seeking to restrain the Housing and Urban Development Department, the Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority (CMDA), and the Heritage Conservation Committee of CMDA from deleting the Royapuram station from the list of heritage buildings.

The petitioner moved the PIL plea based on a news report published in The Hindu on June 22, 2013 titled > Royapuram station may soon be history . The report stated that Southern Railway had approached the Heritage Conservation Committee, seeking the removal of the station from the list so that it could demolish the structure and undertake projects.

The petitioner said, “Though the building is small in size, it has historic importance as the oldest station in the entire sub-continent.” The petitioner contended that the building occupies only a small portion of the 72-acre station premises and termed the “insensitivity of the Southern Railway to the history and heritage of the station building” highly condemnable.

The petitioner also argued that the acceding of the request would sound the death knell to the conservation of heritage structures in the city.

When the plea came up for hearing, the Bench noted that the station was on the list and that there thus was a “mandate prohibitory against the Railways at present.” The Bench suggested that Railways could expand the station while preserving the heritage portion.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.