HC asks social media to block contents against women lawyers

Comments posted by two men lawyers are obscene, petitioners allege

February 07, 2016 12:00 am | Updated 05:32 am IST - CHENNAI:

The Madras High Court has directed Facebook, WhatsApp and Youtube to block certain “objectionable material, containing a scandalous attack”, on women in particular, which was circulated by two lawyers, who were earlier prohibited from practising in any court, pending disciplinary proceedings.

Hearing a PIL plea filed by six women lawyers, practising in the High Court, a Division Bench comprising Justices V. Ramasubramanian and K. Ravichandrabaabu also said that the Superintendent of Police of Cyber Cell shall render necessary assistance to the social networking sites in this regard.

Following a spate of posts that appeared in the social media last week containing remarks against some women lawyers, petitioners Sudha Ramalingam, Anna Mathew, Sathya Rao, S. Devika Rao, M.N. Sumathi and R.S. Akila moved the High Court with a PIL plea.

The audio and written formats posted by respondent W. Peter Ramesh Kumar, in connection with a contempt proceedings, some of which were reposted by another respondent Manikandan Vathan in the social media were “wholly obscene, scandalous, vexatious and create a hostile work environment for women lawyers”, petitioners alleged in their plea.

The petitioners sought to restrain the two lawyers from posting comments in the social media, and a direction to Information Technology department, Facebook, WhatsApp and Youtube to remove uploads by them. Further they sought appropriate guidelines in relation to proceedings and pleadings in courts that contain sexually coloured remarks against women.

The appeal also includes a direction to Information Technology department, Facebook (also the owner of WhatsApp), Youtube and all other media or service providers to frame a protocol. The bench restrained both the respondent lawyers from publishing, distributing and circulating any message or material scandalising the institution and women lawyers. The case was further posted on February 26.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.