Integration is key to commuter patronage

November 29, 2014 10:13 am | Updated 10:13 am IST - CHENNAI:

From 300 km to 20 km: the Monorail project has been sized down to less than a quarter of its originally-proposed length.

When this stretch from Poonamallee to Kathipara, with a link from Porur to Vadapalani, takes off, it will be crucial for the government to integrate it with other existing modes of transport, especially Chennai Metro, if commuters are to benefit from yet another mass rapid transit network.

For instance, Metro and Monorail may be integrated at two junctions: Vadapalani and Kathipara.

Officials at Chennai Metro Rail Limited (CMRL) say they have received no intimation regarding the integration plan but admit such a move is very likely if the Monorail project takes off.

“We can create the necessary facilities to integrate our system with Monorail, depending on the placement of stations and design,” an official says.

Integration will help a great deal in improving commuter mobility at these two congested junctions.

Raj Cherubal of Chennai City Connect says, “Ideally, passengers should be able to simply cross over the platform and change modes of transport. If that is not possible, both stations should be well-connected with either a subway or a foot-overbridge, at the least, allowing passengers to switch over in minutes.”

But the government must go beyond just integrating the different modes of transport, says Arvind Mahajan, partner and head of infrastructure and government services at KPMG, India.

“The common ticketing system should be implemented soon after the transport networks become operational so travelling becomes seamless,” he says.

One major issue is inadequate spending on connecting different modes of transport, says Partha Mukhopadhyay, senior research fellow at the Centre for Policy Research.

“As compared to experimenting with new modes, it will be more useful to think about connecting existing modes of transport, both through infrastructure and initiatives like common ticketing. For instance, Delhi Metro may have been a success in terms of execution but it still has limited connectivity to other modes of transport,” he says.

Mr. Cherubal says MRTS has proven that a mass rapid transit may lose patronage if it does not connect with other modes of transport.

“It took a long time to construct a foot-overbridge near Tidel Park station which ideally should have been done immediately after the station was opened for public use,” he says.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.