BBMP to HC: Bescom transformer on Church Street encroached footpath

July 19, 2014 12:36 am | Updated 12:36 am IST - Bangalore

The BBMP told the Karnataka High Court on Friday that Bescom had installed an electricity transformer on Church Street by encroaching on a huge portion of the footpath. The transformer was allegedly the cause of “electrocution” of a 37-year-old engineer in May last year.

The BBMP Commissioner brought to the notice of the court that Bescom neither sought permission from the BBMP to install the transformer nor had the BBMP accorded permission.

The BBMP pointed out that two 990 kVA transformers, circuit breakers, and other components were installed by encroaching on the footpath to the extent of six feet in width and 34 feet in length.

The report was filed following an earlier direction of the court during the hearing of a petition filed by family members of victim, Manoj Kumar Vasanthrao Patil, who was the vice-president of Sundaram Auto Components.

Compensation sought

The petitioners have sought Rs. 29.81 crore as compensation for the loss that they had suffered due to his death.

They have alleged that Manoj was “electrocuted” due to negligence of Bescom.

However, the BBMP, in its objection, has stated that the petition was not maintainable as disputed facts required to be settled in a civil court through a suit.

Justice Ram Mohan Reddy said that Bescom had failed to submit documents providing correct information on installation of the transformers on Church Street.

While counsel for the Karnataka Electricity Regulatory Commission told the court that it had no role to play in such issues, counsel for Bescom stated that a copy of the BBMP’s report was not made available to them.

Bescom had denied the allegation of the petitioners and had contended that the post-mortem report does not categorically attribute the cause of death to electric shock but only states that death was due to cardiac arrest and that “electrocution being one of the reasons [for cardiac arrest] cannot be ruled out”.

Further hearing has been adjourned till July 23.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.