Architects question aesthetics of steel flyover

October 19, 2016 07:45 am | Updated December 01, 2016 06:51 pm IST

Bengaluru: The steel flyover will not gel well with urban aesthetics and will only look ugly and industrial, lament leading architects.

“Any flyover cuts the line of vision and stands out in urban aesthetics. Concrete allows itself to be designed along the curves and road contours, which will look aesthetically beautiful. But in a steel flyover, the linear form of steel will remain with thousands of joints making it look very industrial. The surface will fade unequally depending on exposure to sunlight, leaving visual imperfections,” says Prof. Sathya Prakash Varanasi, leading architect and convenor, INTACH, Bengaluru.

Naresh Narasimhan, another leading architect and part of Citizens for Bengaluru, said that aesthetically a steel flyover may not look good.

“There are multiple flyovers, up and down ramps at the crucial Chalukya junction, that will ruin the look of the area. We are planning to take legislators on a guided tour of their backyard to show them how it would probably look like,” said Prakash Belwadi, of Citizens for Bengaluru.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.