HC questions Nityananda’s claim

December 19, 2017 07:36 pm | Updated February 03, 2018 01:55 pm IST

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court on Tuesday, while hearing a plea seeking to restrain controversial godman Nityananda from entering the 1500-year-old Madurai Adheenam, questioned how Nityananda could claim to be the head of the adheenam.

Justice R. Mahadevan observed that when the 292nd head was still alive, how could Nityananda claim to be the 293rd head and why a contempt notice should not be issued to him for the claim. The court posted the case for orders on January 3.

Nityananda, in his counter-affidavit, claimed that his appointment as the 293rd ‘Guru Mahasannidhanam’ was as per customs of the adheenam.

The petition filed by M. Jagathalapradapan, founder-trustee of Madurai Meenakshi Children’s Trust, sought a direction to prevent Nityananda from entering the mutt and interfering with its administration.

The petitioner had alleged that Nityananda’s style of worship was not connected to the Saivite tradition of the mutt and he had a hidden agenda to capture the mutt and swindle its properties.

The court had earlier restrained Nityananda and his disciples from entering the mutt and interfering with its affairs.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.